The Labour party suspends Ken Livingstone, but Twitter isn’t buying it
Ken Livingstone has just been suspended from the Labour party. This was the result of outrage from both politicians and the media regarding comments he made about Hitler. But not everyone has jumped on the anti-Livingstone bandwagon.
On 28 April, Livingstone said:
Let’s remember when Hitler won his election in 1932, his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism… I denounce that.
The backlash to his mention of Hitler and Zionism in the same breath was massive. And Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn soon made the following statement:
There were grave concerns about the language [Livingstone] used. We had a discussion about it and decided we would suspend him and he would go through an investigation by [the] party.
However, Livingstone’s words were actually very similar to those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015:
Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time [1941], he wanted to expel the Jew.
Read on...
Twitter reacts
Based on this, and a number of other reasons, many Twitter users came out to defend Livingstone:
Wow, Labour is going all "McCarthy Witch Hunt" at the moment. Ken Livingstone accused of being anti-semitic over pretty much nothing.
— Lord Wibble (@framey) April 28, 2016
Didn't Netanyahu, say same as Ken Livingstone about Hitler wanting to expel Jew? https://t.co/SvTlgwlgj8 to Palestine? Why the witch hunt?
— Siamak-A سیامک (@Salimi) April 28, 2016
Labour suspends Ken Livingstone for recalling fact of Zionist-Nazi alliance. Aljazeera did same to Joseph Massad https://t.co/nN25NEUqDk
— Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) April 28, 2016
Evidently people have an issue with someone stating established facts.#KenLivingstone pic.twitter.com/UJV4sPND4E
— Nin (@Mr_Nin) April 28, 2016
A Nazi board game for children in the Wiener Library is about sending to Jews to Palestine https://t.co/NwpC4jWZ9Z
— Michael Rosen (@MichaelRosenYes) April 28, 2016
WTF! This 'Witch-Hunt is becoming ridiculous! !
Ken Livingstone suspended by Labour Party in 'anti-Semitism' row – https://t.co/gKGidQKC1a— Robert Macdonald (@rushmeadvillas) April 28, 2016
This political sabotage focused on Ken Livingstone reminds me of house of cards pic.twitter.com/yaroIzjbhI
— Jay Cartere (@JayCartere) April 28, 2016
Anti-Zionism vs antisemitism
The final tweet above referenced a statement on 28 April from the Jewish Socialists’ Group, which read:
The Jewish Socialists’ Group sees the current fearmongering about antisemitism in the Labour Party for what it is – a conscious and concerted effort by right-wing political forces to undermine the growing support among Jews and non-Jews alike for the Labour Party leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, and a measure of the desperation of his opponents… This is despite Corbyn’s longstanding record of actively opposing fascism and all forms of racism, and being a firm a supporter of the rights of refugees and of human rights globally.
This statement clarified the important difference between antisemitism and anti-Zionism:
Antisemitism and anti-Zionism are not the same. Zionism is a political ideology which has always been contested within Jewish life since it emerged in 1897, and it is entirely legitimate for non-Jews as well as Jews to express opinions about it, whether positive or negative. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews.
We at The Canary have also insisted on this distinction:
The efforts to deliberately confuse anti-Zionism (criticism of the political movement to establish an apartheid Jewish state), and anti-semitism (the prejudice and persecution of Jewish people) are longstanding.
Was Livingstone right?
Either way, Mike Sivier at Vox Political pointed out after Livingstone’s suspension:
It turns out all those who clamoured for Ken Livingstone to be suspended from the Labour Party – on the basis that Nazi Germany and Zionist Jews never had an agreement – were completely wrong.
He quotes the Haavara Agreement as proof, which was:
an agreement with the German government in August 1933, to facilitate the emigration of Jews to Palestine… The Zionists saw this agreement as a way of attracting Jews to Palestine and thus rescuing them from the Nazi universe even if that meant cooperation with Hitler.
The lesson to take home from today’s media madness surrounding Ken Livingstone’s comments is simple. We should never fall into the trap of equating anti-Zionism and antisemitism. And we should never jump to conclusions based on the comments of right-wing politicians and corporate media outlets.
Get involved!
– Support independent news from Israel, like +972 Magazine and Mondoweiss.
– Support The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via World Economic Forum/Wikimedia Commons
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
