This is the vicious smear campaign launched against junior doctors ahead of contract referendum

Support us and go ad-free

In June a referendum will be held on the newly negotiated junior doctors’ contract. At that point doctors will have a free vote on whether they accept the terms of the contract or not.

However, a suspiciously timed leak has just hit the headlines which may make them think twice about turning down the current offer.

The UK government must be delighted.

The leak is a trove of private WhatsApp messages by the Junior Doctors Commitee (JDC). It covers the period of November 2015 to May 2016, which were some of the most heated months in the contract dispute.

Many media outlets seized on the story immediately, claiming the messages prove that junior doctors aimed to drag out the dispute as long as possible. This assertion partly rests on a message by JDC chair Dr Johann Malawana, who wrote:

The best solution may actually [be] to draw this right out. Into the Europe debate and leadership debate. Punctuated IA [Industrial Action] for a prolonged period and force them to impose against our support.

His “solution” was suggested after talks stalled towards the end of last year. By this stage, the fear of imposition was already circulating and industrial action had been almost unanimously approved by doctors. In a climate where the government appeared unshakeable, ‘drawing it out’ would provide time for it to reconsider that position – as it eventually did – and highlight the steadfast attitude of the doctors on the issue.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Forcing the government to impose the contract would also open up legal routes to a challenge – which also happened – and strengthen the doctors case.

Strategically, these are genius moves. They are solution focused, and they have worked. But they are not tactically aimed at creating an endless industrial dispute with the government, despite what the mainstream media would have you believe.

Much attention has also been paid to a comment by Malawana regarding a round of talks in January. Allegedly, he branded the talks as “rubbish”, but suggested doctors should be involved in order:

to play the political game of always looking reasonable

Reports suggest that this was a cloaked attempt to cultivate the image of the doctors in the dispute. But commentators fail to point out that it would have been fatal not to do so. The British Medical Association (BMA), and the doctors it represents, were squaring off against the most seasoned of political game players: the government. They have also been the subject of brutal treatment at the hands of the media, which is the puppeteer of public opinion.

Not paying attention to their image in the public eye would have been suicidal. They should be commended for that awareness, not condemned.

A further bone of contention is the discovery in the messages that doctors were concerned about pay. Shock, horror. The media seem to have forgotten that this has been a part of the dispute all along, it’s just not the only concern.

This leak, and the resulting reporting, appears to be another attempt to smear the junior doctors. And it’s not surprising when the Editor of the Health Service Journal, who published the leaks, has an obvious bone to pick with them for “refusing to talk” with his publication.

Let’s hope the junior doctors see it for what it is, and place their vote in the referendum based on what is best for the NHS, themselves and the public. Not because this particular witch hunt has branded them as agitators.

The real role they play in our society proves they are anything but.

Get involved!

Get up to date with the junior doctors contract on Twitter with #JuniorDoctorsStrike.

Support The Canary so we can continue to challenge the mainstream media narrative.

Image via Roger Blackwell/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed