The arrest and detention of a 16-year-old girl has raised concerns once again over the way police deal with minors, after she was kept in custody for nearly eight hours. But the case also poses questions over the effectiveness of cyberbullying legislation.
Emma Reynolds from Nottingham was arrested at her school, unannounced, in January of this year. She told the Victoria Derbyshire programme on Monday that two police officers turned up at the main drive of her school and arrested her – after claims of harassment and cyberbullying manifested into possible threats of physical harm.
Reynolds said that:
I didn’t get to say anything. The next thing I knew they were putting me back in the back of their police car. Other kids saw what happened. Everyone was talking about it – I could tell by the looks people gave me. It felt like everyone was judging me. As soon as I got in [into the police station] they patted me down.
She says she was kept in a cell for around five-and-a-half hours before she was allowed to see her Father. Reynolds commented that:
I had no idea what was going on […] There was like grown men on either side of me along the aisle, like screaming, shouting and swearing […] it was horrible.
Reynolds’ father said he was shocked and worried. When her parents went to the police station, they were refused permission to see her and were sent home – where they found police officers waiting to seize all her “tech”, as evidence of cyberbullying. They then arranged for him to see his daughter later that day.
The case against Reynolds was later dropped. In a statement, Nottinghamshire police said:
It is not normal procedure to make arrests on school property. However, in this instance, the action was judged to be warranted based on the threat and risk from the information available at the time.
The case throws up several concerning aspects.
Between March 2014 and March 2015, 94,960 young people aged 10-17 years were arrested – accounting for 10% of all arrests. This is the same as the proportion of young people in England and Wales of offending age. Of these young people, 23% were members of the BAME community, with 11% being black. Contrast this with census statistics, which show that 7.7% of the population are from the BAME community – and just 2.8% are black – and there appears to be a disproportionate rate of arrest for people of colour.
There are also strict guidelines surrounding the arrest of minors, which in Reynolds’ case do not appear to have been fully adhered to. The government states that:
- Anyone over 10 years old – the age of criminal responsibility – can be fingerprinted, photographed and searched in police custody, although sometimes parental consent is required.
- Child suspects have the same rights as arrested adults, such as an entitlement to legal advice, but there are further requirements officers must follow for under-18s.
- The police must try to contact a parent, guardian or carer as soon as possible if they arrest someone under 18.
- An appropriate adult – a parent or guardian, a social worker, or an approved volunteer – must attend the police station and be present during questioning and any searches.
- The College of Policing advises steps should be taken to minimise the time a young person spends in detention, but forces can apply to hold child suspects for up to 96 hours without charge for more serious offences.
Reynolds says that she wasn’t allowed to contact her father, and it would also appear that there was no appropriate adult present when she was being searched and questioned.
However, this is not the only incident to highlight possible failings by the police in terms of the way minors are treated in custody.
The case of “Child H” made headlines earlier this year when an 11-year old girl, who is on the autistic spectrum, was handcuffed, restrained with leg straps and a mesh hood and kept in custody for over 60 hours without an appropriate adult. Investigating, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said:
This was a complex investigation, which found Sussex Police officers failed to respond effectively to the needs of a vulnerable child. While it is clear Child H had significant behavioural problems arising from her disability, Sussex Police and, indeed other agencies which were – or should have been – involved, did not appear to have the skills and capacity to respond to her effectively. The situation was exacerbated by the lack of understanding of Child H’s complex needs.
However, there is also a flip-side to the issue of the arrest and detention of minors. Figures released under a Freedom of Information request earlier this year showed that more than 1,500 child arrests for alleged firearm offences were carried out by police between 2013 and January 2016, with the number increasing by 20% last year – including 506 charges brought by police.
In the case of Reynolds, questions also need to be asked about what prompted another child to make serious complaints to the police – claims that Shauneen Lambe, director of Just For Kids Law, said were “a relatively minor allegation”.
Reynolds had been described as the “ringleader of a hate campaign” against another girl. It would seem logical to believe that the police judged the evidence presented to them strong enough to warrant the arrest of Reynolds, even though the case against her was dropped. Whether or not Reynolds was involved, it’s of concern that the alleged victim didn’t raise the issue at school before contacting police.
An estimated 5.43m young people in the UK have experienced cyberbullying, with 1.26m subjected to extreme cyberbullying on a daily basis. For Lambe to describe an accusation of what was obviously severe cyberbullying as “relatively minor” is wholly inappropriate, especially from the director of a children’s charity.
The case of Emma Reynolds starkly highlights the issues surrounding both the treatment of children by police and the societal problems surrounding both young offenders and alleged victims. While the number of juvenile arrests is falling, institutions and society still, it would seem, need to do more to protect children, in a world where they are growing up quicker than ever.
If you, or someone you know, is a victim of bullying you can contact the National Bullying Helpline on 0845 22 55787.
Volunteer for The Mix – providing essential support for under-25’s.
Donate to the Family Lives charity.
Featured image via houstondwiPhotos mp/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?