Constituency Labour parties (CLPs) have become a battleground in recent weeks, representing the divisions within the Labour party as a whole. Some have been suspended for acts of support for party leader Jeremy Corbyn. Others, on the other hand, have been enforcing rules that seem to disenfranchise newer Labour members – which are considered to be largely supportive of Corbyn.
New members banned from voting in the leadership elections (and supporting nomination meetings)
In particular, Labour members who have joined the party since 12 January 2016 have been banned from voting in the upcoming leadership election. This has not got down very well. In the next few days, it will be challenged in court by a group of young party members who have been raising money online for their cause and insisting on their right to vote.
But not only have these new members been denied a vote in the leadership contest. They have also been denied a vote in the supporting nomination process.
One Labour party member who has joined since January told The Canary:
I’m not only banned from voting in the leadership election (or would be had I not paid the £25 democracy surcharge) but I’m also banned from attending my CLP’s meeting to discuss supporting nominations
And in the following message sent to The Canary from Calder Valley CLP and dated 24 July, this practice was described in greater detail:
New members banned from attending Labour’s national conference as delegates
The Labour website says, without any specifications about the time members have been in the party, that CLPs “can choose the members from your area to represent you at annual conference”. But new members have recently found out that they cannot be chosen to represent other members at the national conference in September.
Bridget Chapman, who The Canary mentioned in its previous post on this issue, recently gave us more details about her status as an elected delegate to the Labour party conference being cancelled. We pointed out that the Calder Valley CLP had argued that delegates for the national conference had to have been members for at least 12 months before 24 June 2016, and Chapman confirmed that both her own CLP (Folkestone & Hythe) and Thanet South had also been affected by this rule. She also said:
The fact that they have missed out the date of my joining and it is represented by XXX suggests to me that this may be an email that has been sent out to a number of members across the country.
Chapman was told she could apply for a “Members pass” if she still wanted to attend the conference. But for her personally, there was an economic cost of her initial rejection:
I have paid a delegate fee of £116 – there is no mention of returning this. In addition I paid up front for a hotel at a cost of just under £200. So I’m £316 down and have been disenfranchised.
Labour’s procedural rule quoted in the email sent to her was Chapter 3, Clause 1, Rule 4F, which states:
All delegates must have been individual members of the Party for at least 12 months at the closing date set for the receipt of names of delegates.
The fact that this decision is backed up by official rules will mean little to new Labour members who feel like their voices are not valued as much as older members.
As expressed earlier in this email, however, new members are fighting back – challenging their disenfranchisement from the leadership vote and paying £25 for the right to vote as supporters. So while the rules barring new members from participating in supposedly democratic processes seem to protect the Labour party’s established order, the tides of change may well prove to be too strong to hold back.
– If you would like to pledge support for the Labour members fighting for their right to vote, you can do so here.
– If you’re a Labour member and have queries about the national conference, you can contact Conference Services on 0345 092 3311 or [email protected]
– Read our other articles on the Labour Leadership election.
– See more from us on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict here.
– Support The Canary so we can keep bringing you the news that’s important to you.
Featured image via Garry Knight/Wikimedia Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?