The Sunday Times is facing strong criticism today for publishing the comments of Labour MPs expressing a desire for Jeremy Corbyn to die, as the only means of removing him from the leadership of the party.
In Sunday Times, "moderate" Labour MPs describe half a million members as "off-the-page nuts" & wish for Corbyn's early death. Reprehensible pic.twitter.com/IX6sdfu8Et
— Jeremy for PM (@jeremyforlab) October 23, 2016
The comments quickly went viral on social media, with many wishing to make their views on the matter known.
@Harryslaststand Do these people exist or are 'un- named sources' a journalist's way of giving legitimacy to a made up story?
— Philip Davies #FBPE (@pdss9) October 23, 2016
— Fred Bloggs #JC4PM (@BloggsMr) October 23, 2016
Well now you know the type of people who call themselves "moderate labourites, and you voted for them, take heed!
— muriel wickenden (@murielwickenden) October 23, 2016
The comments come just weeks after Guardian columnist Nicholas Lezard ‘joked’ with a member of the Jewish Labour Movement on Facebook about crowdfunding the assassination of Jeremy Corbyn.
Another source of concern for complainants against this behaviour is a perceived double standard. Rules around social media behaviour and anti-bullying guidelines were used to purge the Labour party of many pro-Corbyn supporters over the summer, while their political opponents seemingly went unpunished.
As an example, a University of Bristol student was investigated by the university over the summer for telling her Labour MP, Thangam Debbonaire, to “get in the sea” for her role in the Labour coup. Debbonaire claimed that the colloquial phrase (the equivalent of ‘to hell with you’, which has an entire social media movement attached to it) was a literal “threat to kill”. She demanded Bristol University take action against the student.
At the same time, it appeared little if no action was being taken against Labour MPs and activists on the right of the party. The leadership campaign of Angela Eagle was case in point.
Eagle’s short-lived Labour leadership campaign was blighted by false accusations of bigotry against Labour supporters who didn’t want to vote for Owen Smith (or her) as leader.
First, she claimed Corbyn supporters had thrown a brick through the window of her constituency office. It was later revealed that a) it wasn’t her office that had been vandalised, and b) there was no evidence whatsoever about the perpetrator or their motive.
Eagle also failed to correct claims by Tessa Jowell that she’d received homophobic abuse from Corbyn supporters at a meeting of her Constituency Labour Party. It was later revealed that Eagle hadn’t even attended the meeting, and two of the members she’d made allegations against were well-known, active LGBT advocates – indeed, one was attending the wedding of her own LGBT daughter the following morning.
Eagle also claimed to have had to cancel an event on the advice of the police, due to receiving threats of violence which she once again attributed to Corbyn supporters. But the hotel hosting the event later revealed that it had cancelled the event over a technicality, and that it had received no threats.
Despite all this, The Guardian still grants Eagle a platform to continue a smear campaign which has been found, time and again, to be entirely baseless.
In this context, it is easy to see how Corbyn supporters might feel there is an unequal standard being applied. Journalists and MPs can be caught lying, or advocate openly for the death of Jeremy Corbyn, and face no repercussions. Meanwhile, Corbyn supporters cannot share a tweet from the Green Party without being purged from the party membership. A problem that the Labour party needs to get to grips with, fast.
Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons
Correction: This article was updated at 1600 on 26 October. It originally claimed that a University of Bristol student was investigated by the police, when in fact the investigation was carried out by the university. It also suggested that Labour MP Thangam Debbonaire had demanded that the police take action – again, Debbonaire’s request was for the university to take action, not the police.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?