The Sunday Times is facing strong criticism today for publishing the comments of Labour MPs expressing a desire for Jeremy Corbyn to die, as the only means of removing him from the leadership of the party.
In Sunday Times, "moderate" Labour MPs describe half a million members as "off-the-page nuts" & wish for Corbyn's early death. Reprehensible pic.twitter.com/IX6sdfu8Et
— Jeremy for PM (@jeremyforlab) October 23, 2016
The comments quickly went viral on social media, with many wishing to make their views on the matter known.
@Harryslaststand Do these people exist or are 'un- named sources' a journalist's way of giving legitimacy to a made up story?
— Philip Davies #FBPE (@pdss9) October 23, 2016
— Fred Bloggs #JC4PM (@BloggsMr) October 23, 2016
Well now you know the type of people who call themselves "moderate labourites, and you voted for them, take heed!
— muriel wickenden (@murielwickenden) October 23, 2016
The comments come just weeks after Guardian columnist Nicholas Lezard ‘joked’ with a member of the Jewish Labour Movement on Facebook about crowdfunding the assassination of Jeremy Corbyn.
Another source of concern for complainants against this behaviour is a perceived double standard. Rules around social media behaviour and anti-bullying guidelines were used to purge the Labour party of many pro-Corbyn supporters over the summer, while their political opponents seemingly went unpunished.
As an example, a University of Bristol student was investigated by the university over the summer for telling her Labour MP, Thangam Debbonaire, to “get in the sea” for her role in the Labour coup. Debbonaire claimed that the colloquial phrase (the equivalent of ‘to hell with you’, which has an entire social media movement attached to it) was a literal “threat to kill”. She demanded Bristol University take action against the student.
At the same time, it appeared little if no action was being taken against Labour MPs and activists on the right of the party. The leadership campaign of Angela Eagle was case in point.
Eagle’s short-lived Labour leadership campaign was blighted by false accusations of bigotry against Labour supporters who didn’t want to vote for Owen Smith (or her) as leader.
First, she claimed Corbyn supporters had thrown a brick through the window of her constituency office. It was later revealed that a) it wasn’t her office that had been vandalised, and b) there was no evidence whatsoever about the perpetrator or their motive.
Eagle also failed to correct claims by Tessa Jowell that she’d received homophobic abuse from Corbyn supporters at a meeting of her Constituency Labour Party. It was later revealed that Eagle hadn’t even attended the meeting, and two of the members she’d made allegations against were well-known, active LGBT advocates – indeed, one was attending the wedding of her own LGBT daughter the following morning.
Eagle also claimed to have had to cancel an event on the advice of the police, due to receiving threats of violence which she once again attributed to Corbyn supporters. But the hotel hosting the event later revealed that it had cancelled the event over a technicality, and that it had received no threats.
Despite all this, The Guardian still grants Eagle a platform to continue a smear campaign which has been found, time and again, to be entirely baseless.
In this context, it is easy to see how Corbyn supporters might feel there is an unequal standard being applied. Journalists and MPs can be caught lying, or advocate openly for the death of Jeremy Corbyn, and face no repercussions. Meanwhile, Corbyn supporters cannot share a tweet from the Green Party without being purged from the party membership. A problem that the Labour party needs to get to grips with, fast.
Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons
Correction: This article was updated at 1600 on 26 October. It originally claimed that a University of Bristol student was investigated by the police, when in fact the investigation was carried out by the university. It also suggested that Labour MP Thangam Debbonaire had demanded that the police take action – again, Debbonaire’s request was for the university to take action, not the police.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?