On 19 October, The Canary‘s Editor-in-Chief Kerry-Anne Mendoza spoke at an event. The evening’s topic was The Future of New Media and a part of the Real Media Tour. During her commentary, Mendoza revealed one of the central motives behind The Canary venture. And it should inspire anyone who feels the UK’s current media landscape needs reinvention:
Leading by example
First of all, Mendoza described The Canary‘s first year of life. She explained how the company had started with very little money, but within just a couple of months was getting the attention of mainstream media outlets like The Telegraph. She also acknowledged what the enterprise has planned for the coming year.
During the conclusion of her contribution, she spoke about one of the main reasons she began the venture:
One of the metrics for success that we had when we launched The Canary was that we don’t want to be a ‘new media’ version of the Murdoch empire. We’re not empire building. We’re proving a concept.
That concept, she explained, is proving that anyone can do it. The Canary was started on a shoestring budget. So if The Canary could do it, so can you. And Mendoza hopes that, within the next two or three years’ time, “not only is The Canary itself thriving but we’ve generated 50 other Canaries”.
She also noted why she believes such an expansion of the media landscape is important:
that way, instead of the situation we’ve been in for so long – which is looking at the failure of traditional media in terms of the narrowness of the topics covered, what they miss, what they misreport, and complaining – we’re now in the position where we can proactively do something about it. And I think that’s absolutely thrilling.
It’s not a new problem
The “failure of traditional media” that Mendoza noted was then given further explanation by Real Media‘s Tom Barlow:
He highlighted how Noam Chomsky and Edward S Herman had laid out the “five filters theory” in the book Manufacturing Consent.
He explained that all information, before it’s passed to the public, is put through these ‘filters’ by the traditional media. Barlow commented:
Those filters are the ownership of the media. We know that 80% of the press is owned by five billionaires. We know that 70% of TV and radio news is owned by the state, the BBC. So ownership is important.
Funding is important. Advertising… the licence fee. Multinational advertisers will want their interests represented.
Mostly, this is something that journalists internalise. They know who their owners are; they know who their advertisers are.
Barlow then spoke about a third filter generated by the pressures of journalism. He claimed that the push in the profession to create content quickly means that some news sources are not checked. And those that escape scrutiny are mainly thinktanks or government sources. PR companies, essentially. As a result, he asserted:
In fact, 80% of everything you read in the press is written by PR companies… PR (public relations) used to be called propaganda
Finally, Barlow noted that the news is put through a filter that mobilises fear and patriotism. And it’s one that equates to a “fear of the rich”, with journalists anxious about costly reprisals from the powerful should they take them on.
A blast from the past
Chomsky asserts that the last time we had a free press was in the mid-nineteenth century. But there was subsequently a concerted attempt to shut it down. And it was “finally understood that the way to eliminate it was by advertising, by reliance on advertising and by concentration of capital”. The filters detailed above are a direct consequence of that.
But The Canary‘s success in its first year shows that many members of the public are hungry to draw from that 19th-century model.
A media that solely serves as a mouthpiece for the powerful is no longer enough. And the rise of the alternative media is a testament to that.
So the ground is fertile. And it eagerly awaits those 50 new Canaries. Because, new Canaries, your country needs YOU.
– Support The Canary, and the work of other new media organisations:
Featured image via Real Media/Youtube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?