The huge internet attack to protect Julian Assange could have been far bigger, and it could happen again

On 21 October 2016, major sites across the internet were disabled as a result of a massive DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack by unknown actors. By the end of the day, some extraordinary statements appeared on Twitter. They claimed the attack was in retaliation to events surrounding the fate of WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange.

But the attack could have gone on for much longer if WikiLeaks hadn’t made it clear that Assange was not in danger, and asked for an end to the DDoS attack. And unless Assange’s safety is proven, a similar attack could well be on the cards.

How the attack worked

A ‘botnet‘ was at the heart of the attack. This is when hackers infect a computer network (bot) with malicious software without the users’ knowledge so that they can control the computers remotely to perform automated tasks.

Motherboard explains that, according to Level 3 Communications (one of the world’s largest internet backbone providers) and security firm Flashpoint, a massive botnet of hacked devices (including home webcams) was implicated in the DDoS attack. The target was Dyn’s Domain Name System (DNS) management services infrastructure.

At one point during the outage, Hacktivist group Anonymous tweeted that the attack would continue. It then became clear that this was no ‘routine’ attack, but was affecting millions of people around the world.

But who was behind the attack? And why did it take place?

The warning signs

In the week leading up to the attack, various events took place:

Read on...

  • On 15 and 16 October, Julian Assange’s internet connection was partly cut. WikiLeaks said the Ecuadorian government had taken this action as it was concerned about the organisation’s interference in the US elections. Ecuador confirmed this, but insisted the restriction was only temporary and that “the circumstances that led to the granting of [Assange’s] asylum remain”.
  • On 16 October, as a result of the restriction, WikiLeaks transmitted via Twitter three coded messages – or ‘Contingency Plans‘. It refers to these as ‘insurance files’, in case WikiLeaks or Assange come under direct threat.

On 17 October, Donald Trump advisor Roger Stone tweeted that the US had threatened Ecuador with “grave consequences” if Assange wasn’t silenced. He also claimed the US had asked the UK to revoke Ecuador’s diplomatic status, and that British forces were preparing to storm the embassy.

Then, a picture appeared of armed police outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on 18 October. WikiLeaks, meanwhile, released a detailed report on how there had been an attempt by online ‘dating agency’ ToddAndClare (T&C) to frame Assange – to make it look like Assange had been paid $1m by the Russian government. (For more on the ToddAndClare case, and its apparent relationship with a private intelligence-gathering agency in San Francisco linked to Hillary Clinton, see here.)

All these events combined set retaliation attempts in motion.

WikiLeaks intervenes

On 21 October, the DDoS attack brought down major internet sites like Twitter and Netflix. A number of Twitter accounts related the attack directly to Julian Assange, calling it a warning ‘not to touch a hair on his head’.

Hours later, WikiLeaks tweeted:

Not long after that tweet, the DDoS attack ceased and sites were accessible again.

No one has claimed responsibility for what happened. But the reality is that it could have been even bigger and more dramatic than it was. If reports that Julian Assange was dead had been true, what we witnessed on 21 October would have been nothing compared with the cyber-firestorm that could have taken place. And with some supporters still unconvinced, WikiLeaks is now looking for ways to prove he is alive and well. If it can’t do this, another cyber-attack could be just around the corner.

Get Involved!

Read up on the latest from WikiLeaks.

– Donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

– Request President Obama provides clemency to Edward Snowden.

Featured image via WikiLeaks and Cancillería del Ecuador

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed