A Sunday Times film critic has gone to war with film director Ken Loach for daring to portray the painful, stifling and maddening existence of life as a benefit claimant in Britain today – and she has already lost.
— Sixteen Films & Ken Loach (@KenLoachSixteen) October 23, 2016
Poor Ken Loach. I'd be fucking angry if I wasn't Mike Leigh, too
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
— Camilla Long (@camillalong) October 24, 2016
Loach’s latest film follows the kafka-esque tribulations of carpenter Daniel Blake after he suffers a heart attack, and requires the support of the welfare state. The work capability assessment system, the unfeeling Jobcentre staff, the administrative errors for which no one is seemingly responsible, and the synthetic optimism of job coaching classes. The film is devastating. And it is only devastating because it is true.
The names that match the numbers
The government’s own statistics show that between 2010 and 2011 10,600 sick and disabled people died within six weeks of their work capability assessment by Atos and the DWP. These people spent their final weeks on earth, being harassed by the Jobcentre through late payment notices and threats of eviction as their social safety net was ripped away.
As this horrific figure of more than one person every hour is almost too large to conceive, here are some names among that number.
Linda Wootton, 49, was on 10 different types of medication each day after a double lung and heart transplant. She was weak and suffered regular bouts of blackouts. She was put through the Atos Work Capability Assessment, and as she lay in a hospital bed dying, she received confirmation she was ‘fit to work’. She died just nine days later. Her husband Peter said:
I sat there and listened to my wife drown in her own bodily fluids. It took half an hour for her to die; a woman who is apparently fit for work
Brian McArdle, 57, had been left paralysed down one side, blind in one eye, unable to speak properly and barely able to eat and dress himself after a stroke on Boxing Day in 2011. Despite this, he was deemed ‘fit to work’ by Atos. He died of a heart attack the day after his benefit payments were stopped. His 13 year-old son Kieran told the Daily Record:
Even though my dad had another stroke just days before his assessment, he was determined to go…He tried his best to walk and talk because he was a very proud man, but even an idiot could have seen my dad wasn’t fit for work.
Colin Traynor, 29, suffered from epilepsy. He was deemed ‘fit for work’ by the DWP after an Atos assessment and forced to enter a lengthy, bureaucratic process to appeal the decision – during which his benefits would be frozen. He did not live to see the result of his appeal. Five weeks after his death, his family received the news that his appeal was successful. Too late for Colin. His father Ray said:
I firmly believe – 100% believe – that the system this government introduced has killed my son.
The government quickly stopped counting the number of people dying while undergoing work capability assessments, but as the project only accelerated – we can safely assume that things at the least remained the same. At the rate at which people are dying – these three represent the death toll in only the last three hours. This is not the occasional poor decision. This is a Linda, a Brian, or a Colin – every hour, all day, every day, dying because this system is designed to throw people out of the social security system.
Long’s oblivious contempt
But for Sunday Times film critic Camilla Long, this world does not exist. Describing the film as “a povvo safari for middle-class do-gooders”, Long can’t seem to get her head around the idea that anyone could find themselves so hopelessly trapped. Her giveaway is this section:
Katie (Hayley Squires) is a single mother from London whom Dan meets in the benefits office. She has mysteriously been relocated to Newcastle with her children. Even by the horrifying lows of the system, it seems astonishing that she has been sent this far. But we must believe that it happened — it’s real research! — just as we must believe Daniel wouldn’t at any point think to simply telephone his doctor or remotely entertain the idea of learning about computers. It constantly hectors the viewer. But it never feels quite genuine.
Long finds the film so hard to believe because she has literally no idea that people actually live like this in Britain. Presented with the possibility, she blames both Loach and anyone who ‘allows’ themselves to sink so low in life.
A 2015 report by The Independent found that more than 50,000 families had been shipped out of London by local councils in the previous three years, due to benefit cuts and soaring rents. That’s 500 families a week. The report states that these families were moved “to locations including Manchester, Bradford, Hastings, Pembrokeshire, Dover and Plymouth.”
So, very real. In fact, endemic. But for Long, totally unbelievable and “cherry-picked”.
…it never feels quite genuine.
This is never more obvious than in a scene at a food bank, where Katie is so hungry, she breaks into a can of beans in front of the horrified workers. It is meant to feel raw, feral, real — the benefits system makes animals out of all of us. But it felt manipulative and ridiculous.
There are currently more than 1.1 million people in the UK dependent on food banks. This is up from just over 40,000 prior to the austerity policies of the coalition government. Yet Long doesn’t find it believable that such staggering levels of poverty and desperation might drive people to feral behaviour?
What would Long make of the plight of Daniel Guantlett? The 35-year-old homeless father froze to death on the porch of an unoccupied bungalow in Kent, because due to the government’s anti-squatting laws, he feared arrest if he slept inside. And what about Ranjit Singh? The 48-year-old was crushed to death by a garbage truck after spending the night sleeping in a wheelie bin to stave off the cold. In researching this piece, I was stunned to find a string of such stories in recent years. In 2012, The Independent reported the body of a 50-year-old homeless man (unnamed) found by another waste company in the Wirral having suffered the same fate. The same happened to a 30-year-old man in November 2009. There are many other examples.
But this is a world Long clearly knows less than nothing about. But that doesn’t stop her having an opinion. Her writing drips with contempt. Not just for Loach (for telling the story), but for anyone who might actually find themselves living the life of Daniel Blake. In doing so, she has betrayed an ignorance so deep and craven as to serve as testimony to her entire class. As Twitter users pointed out:
— Heather Smart 🌹 (@gemini2359) October 23, 2016
The photo of her caviar indulgence says it all – wouldn't expect compassion or humanity from a Murdoch hack.
— Citizen Kev Barretto (@CitizenKev61) October 23, 2016
It reminds me why I no longer buy the Sunday Times.
— Michelle Langan 🦄 (@Liverpoolshell) October 23, 2016
The only person guilty of being “patronising and simplistic” here is Long. Perhaps if she popped on a pashmina and took an Uber out of Westminster, or Primrose Hill, or whichever island of privilege she resides in, this wouldn’t have to come as news.
– Find out how you can support the work of the Trussell Trust network of food banks here.
– Send Ken Loach a message of support here.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?