Six years of rampant Conservative austerity have reached breaking point. Government cuts have now created such bad social care conditions that hundreds of people are being banned from visiting their elderly relatives. Just for complaining about quality of care.
While care homes shouldn’t ban relatives, austerity is demonstrably the root cause of the tragedy gripping healthcare in the UK. Just three of the 44 health areas have published reports, known as Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs), on how they will provide services for the next five years. And already, it doesn’t look good. Birmingham and Solihull, North Central London and South West London warn they face a shortfall of more than £2.4bn by 2020. Without this funding, they will struggle to provide hospital beds in the NHS and a basic level of social care.
Deep fiscal cuts are having a very real and disturbing impact. The Conservatives’ austerity programme has already led to the biggest rise in death rates among the elderly for nearly 50 years. Advisers to Public Health England (PHE) warned that the four-year trend may be the worst since World War II. Data from the Office of National Statistics shows a 5.4% (27,000) increase in deaths in 2015 alone. The Conservatives are taking us back to the past with deep cuts, and the elderly are falling by the wayside.
Privatisation by stealth
The government’s STPs go much further than issuing reports. NHS England says STPs must show:
how local services will evolve and become sustainable over the next five years – ultimately delivering the Five Year Forward View vision of better health, better patient care and improved NHS efficiency.
But there’s more to it than that. The country has been split into 44 health sections (known as ‘footprint’ areas). And now, NHS England CEO Simon Stevens has said he wants them to become “combined authorities”. Ultimately, this would take power away from local hospitals and hand it to distant executives in boardrooms and the Department of Health (DoH). Thereby making widespread privatisation easier.
A group of NHS workers and campaigners warned The Canary that STPs will lead to further privatisation of the NHS and social care:
In short STP are key to cuts, privatisation, and central control over the NHS and social care, as the plans have to eliminate any deficits – which will surely involve cuts to services and closures. The government [are already committed to] encouraging long term NHS partnerships with the private sector in key areas.
These plans are explicitly an opportunity for increased privatisation and will rapidly set up NHS England’s Five Year Forward View initiatives like new care models and new organisational forms. This will lead to a health and social care service modelled along American private health company lines.
The Five Year Forward View and the STP that NHS England has imposed to fast track its implementation is effectively the endgame for the NHS as a comprehensive health service that is free at the point of use and based on a patient’s clinical need.
Privatisation is the ultimate aim of the Conservative government. Spending cuts will cripple the NHS to the point where it needs private funding to make up the public shortfall.
This plan has drastic costs. Now people are being banned from visiting their own sick relatives, austerity has finally reached breaking point. And with elderly mortality rates at their highest since the Second World War, it appears no amount of deaths are too high for a government hell-bent on privatisating our NHS and social care.
– Support the Save Our NHS campaign, and other NHS campaigns.
Featured image via YouTube screenshot
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?