Theresa May just received a very nasty surprise, and it’s brilliant news for the British public

Tracy Keeling

Prime Minister Theresa May just received some very bad news. A petition calling for the repeal of the Investigatory Powers (IP) bill reached over 100,000 signatures on 26 November. So parliament may, consequently, have to debate the draconian bill again.

While May has persuaded many politicians to support the mass surveillance legislation, the public has now stepped up its opposition. And with the Orwellian powers the IP bill contains, resistance is crucial.

Theresa May’s pet project

May proposed the IP bill in November 2015, when she was Home Secretary, after whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations. Snowden had exposed the UK’s already existent mass surveillance programmes.

The IP bill will legitimise such practices. And essentially remove the right to privacy from UK citizens. When people communicate electronically, or interact with technology, internet service providers (ISPs) will have to store a record of that activity. And a long list of officials will be able to access those records. So an individual visiting a website, for example, will no longer be a ‘personal’ activity. Because the record of that interaction could surface and be used to profile them at any time.

The bill passed in parliament on 7 June. The House of Lords then approved it in November. But the petition was created on parliament’s own petition site. And according to that site’s criteria, parliament must consider it for a debate because it gained over 100,000 signatures.

Second chances

As Open Rights Group Executive Director Jim Killock noted, further debate would give MPs “another chance to consider what they have voted for”. It would also give the SNP, the Liberal Democrats, and the Green Party further opportunity to oppose the bill. These parties voted against it in June.

Furthermore, Killock explained, a debate would enable MPs to consider the legal issues that may arise in upcoming court cases over the UK’s spying policies. The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), for instance, is currently hearing one case about data retention, brought by Labour’s Deputy Leader Tom Watson and David Davis MP (prior to Davis becoming a minister). And the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is also investigating whether the mass surveillance carried out by the UK’s spy agencies constitutes a violation of our fundamental rights.

Protect yourself if parliament won’t

Meanwhile, UK citizens and tech firms are gearing up to protect themselves from the bill, should it receive royal assent. Tech companies are concerned that the vast amounts of collected data could fall into the wrong hands. Chairman of the Internet Service Providers’ Association (Ispa) James Blessing said:

It only takes one bad actor to go in there and get the entire database

So the profile of services that can avoid retaining such data is rising. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), for example, protect your web browsing by bouncing the online activity through different servers. ISPs can log that you used a VPN but cannot record the actual websites you visit.

VPN operators expect a boom in users when the IP bill takes effect. But that partly depends on whether parliament takes the opportunity, granted by the petition, to reflect on the bill. It also depends on whether parliament chooses to respond to this public outcry by removing its more intrusive and sweeping elements.

That’s exactly what it should do. Because the IP bill, in its current form, has no place in a democracy.

Get Involved!

Sign the petition to repeal the IP bill in its current form.

Take action to protect your privacy with the Open Rights Group.

Email your MP to urge them to debate the IP bill.

Read more Canary articles on the IP bill.

Featured image via Policy Exchange/Flickr

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed