Watch another government minister dodge Trident questions, in a car crash interview on Sky [VIDEO]

Support us and go ad-free

On Sunday 22 January, Andrew Marr interviewed Theresa May about Trident. He pressed her on whether she knew about a failed missile launch which occurred just before parliament voted to renew the nuclear weapons system in July. Now, Business Secretary Greg Clark has also evaded questions about that failed test.

The failed test

The Sunday Times revealed [paywall] the failed test on 22 January:

The Sunday Times can reveal that a Trident II D5 missile — which can kill millions when armed with nuclear warheads — experienced an alarming failure after being launched from a British submarine off the coast of Florida in June last year.

It was the only firing test of a British nuclear missile in four years and raises serious questions about the reliability and safety of the weapons system. The failure prompted a news blackout by Downing Street that has remained in place until this weekend.

And:

The cause of the failure remains top secret but a senior naval source has told this newspaper that the missile — which was unarmed for the test – may have veered off in the wrong direction towards America after being launched from HMS Vengeance, one of Britain’s four nuclear-armed submarines.

On 23 January, Sky News asked Clark if he knew about the incident before the renewal vote:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The interview

Sky‘s Sarah-Jane Mee asked Clark if he knew there had been a failed missile test. After a long pause (the first of many, which Clark claimed were due to sound problems), he responded:

As the Prime Minister said yesterday, on Trident, it’s not the approach of the government to comment on the various tests of weapon systems

Mee stopped Clark at that point and said that this was “blatantly not true”. She pointed out that the government has issued press releases on successful weapon tests and questioned why the country, and especially parliament, were not informed about a test that had failed. Clark responded:

In terms of what’s happened in the past, I think there have been occasions in which photographs have been released, but as a general policy, it has not been the approach to comment on all of the different tests of the systems and the weapons.

Somewhat ironically, there was a background noise at 01:19 in the video which sounded like a car crashing.

Meanwhile, Mee continued to point out that the government does comment on Trident tests. She also asked Clark if the Prime Minister knew about the failed test. Clark responded:

Well, I think if you’ve got a policy that you don’t comment on all of the tests of our weapons systems, whatever they are, then you’ve got to… apply that approach, and that’s what the Prime Minister did yesterday.

And Mee kept pressing Clark on whether he or the Prime Minister knew. But Clark continued to swap between complaining about sound issues and avoiding the question. Mee concluded the interview by saying:

Mr Greg Clark, we’re going to leave it there. Miscommunication on so many levels.

Theresa May’s non-response

When Andrew Marr questioned the PM about the failed Trident test, meanwhile, he directly asked her if she knew about the failed launch before the Trident renewal vote. No fewer than four times! And she refused to answer on all four occasions:

This is how some MPs responded:

Information

The government is claiming that it does not comment on all weapons tests. But it certainly does comment on some tests. And it seems like a test of this significance would deserve comment.

People could argue that not commenting is a defence strategy, as we would not want our enemies to know about any failings. But many members of parliament voted to renew Trident without the broadest range of information. Theresa May needs to explain if she herself had this information; and if so, why she withheld it.

Get Involved!

Take action with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.

Write to your MP to express your views on Trident.

Featured image via screengrab / Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed