Fed up commuters are taking the Conservative government to court over the chaos on the Southern Rail network. On Wednesday 1 February, an application for a judge to review the Conservatives’ chaotic handling of the crisis was lodged. And it could see the government in the dock over the rail fiasco.
The government in the dock?
The Association of British Commuters (ABC) has applied for a judicial review into the government’s handling of the Southern Rail crisis. This is a legal process whereby the High Court reviews how the Department for Transport (DfT) has dealt with the rail company. If the government is found to have not fulfilled its duties, the court can declare DfT actions unlawful, forcing the government to intervene to resolve the crisis.
The ABC grew because of grassroots efforts among angry southern commuters. But because of the state of Southern Rail, the group decided to crowdfund to take legal action. The two areas where the ABC want a judicial review to look into are:
- Delay. The ABC believes Secretary of State for Transport Chris Grayling has acted unlawfully by delaying a decision as to whether Southern Rail’s parent company, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR), has breached its franchise agreement.
- Discrimination. The ABC also believes the government has failed to comply with his duties under the Equality Act 2010 and has as a result caused indirect discrimination to passengers with disabilities.
Blowing the whistle for passengers
The ‘delay’ element relates to the government’s failure to enforce GTR contractual obligations. Namely, the ABC believes that the company has failed to meet its performance targets, and that the government has done nothing to try and remedy this.
The ‘discrimination’ element relates to the government’s alleged breaches of disabled people’s rights. Namely the ABC believes that Southern Rail is in breach of the Equality Act 2010 regarding its scrapping of full disabled access at 33 stations. Further alleged breaches relate to overcrowding due to GTR mismanagement disproportionately affecting disabled passengers. And the government’s failure to force GTR to act to stop this.
Southern Rail has repeatedly hit the headlines in the past year. Commuters rate its parent company GTR as the worst rail company for punctuality. Just 81.5% of its trains arrive on time. And the National Rail Passenger Survey named it the worst rail company in Britain.
As The Canary previously reported, the government announced in September 2016 an extra £20m for GTR. This was to try and sort out the rail operator’s mess. And it was coming from public money. But there was an almighty slap in the face for passengers and workers alike. Southern Rail had actually just increased its profits to nearly £100m. Also trade unions and Southern Rail are currently in a protracted industrial dispute about driver-only operation (DOO) trains.
Commuters. Out of patience
And all of this means continued chaos for commuters. As Lianna Etkind from the Campaign for Better Transport said, the legal case:
is a step forward for passenger power. It is absolutely right that the government is held to account for the failings of the Southern franchise… [It] has made peoples’ lives a misery. Long before any industrial dispute, Southern passengers had to rely on a train service plagued by delays and disruptions, under a management contract with no financial penalties for poor performance.
The court will serve the government the action. And it will have 21 days to respond before a judge decides whether the review has grounds to go ahead. If it does, then the ABC will be crowdfunding again to get the government in the dock. And judging by the appalling state of Southern Rail, there may be many passengers willing to donate to this case.
– Rail users who’ve suffered because of Southern Rail can contact ABC via [email protected] .
– Sign the petition to renationalise Southern Rail.
– Support Bring Back British Rail, campaigning for renationalisation.
Featured image via the ABC
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?