While many were celebrating love this Valentine’s Day, the creator of the ‘ban gay marriage’ petition was not. But although the petition itself is pretty toxic, the reaction of most people has been refreshing.
The petition is hosted on the government’s website, and entitled ‘To define marriage as exclusively only between one man and one woman.’ It has received over 2,500 signatures at time of writing, and its author William George states:
The definition of marriage by the UK parliament should be the traditional definition of One Man and One Woman, nothing else, and should be taught as such in the education system.
What this means in practice is revoking the right of same sex couples to marry. And it would also forbid same-sex relationships being given parity in sex and relationship education in schools.
The petition continues to attract signatures. However, when it began circulating on Facebook, many took to the comments section to air their grievances.
Similar reactions began whizzing around Twitter too.
I'd rather start a petition to tell you to shove it up your homophobic arse so FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!https://t.co/lxeFtRcFpd
— Donnie MacAulay (@domac2000) February 18, 2017
What the fuck. Wake up. It's 2017 love. https://t.co/PScuxSgT2K
— GreatnessFromChris (@ChrisW_Electric) February 18, 2017
To see this reaction to an attack on the LGBT community is a reminder of how far Britain has come in this struggle. And that is has to happen at all, is a reminder of the work still to do. Bottom line: agitating against other groups being granted rights you already enjoy is not activism, it is oppression.
Featured image via UK Government and Parliament Petition Site
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?