The Telegraph has called for the beheading of Nicola Sturgeon. In the wake of the First Minister beginning the process for a second independence referendum, the national newspaper that claims a monthly readership of 27.1 million ran the headline:
People took to social media to express their outrage at what they say amounts to “incitement”. Calls for the murder of an elected representative are wrong, no matter whether they are intended to be taken in jest. And given the political murder of Labour MP Jo Cox in June 2016, there is surely a responsibility for newspapers to be extra cautious.
The Telegraph has since changed the headline. But it still brands Sturgeon as “another treacherous queen of Scots”.
On social media, one spat between the author of the piece and a concerned reader turned extraordinary. Columnist Allison Pearson accused ‘Jen Jansen’ of libel for quoting the Telegraph headline back to her:
Professional journalist thinks it's libel if people believe stuff with your byline on it was written by you. pic.twitter.com/eFfOyxGJMN
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
— Wings Over Scotland (@WingsScotland) March 15, 2017
Pearson may not have written the headline, but someone at The Telegraph did. And her byline is attached to it. Besides, the headline is not the only cause for concern when it comes to Pearson. A personal tweet from the columnist on 13 March read:
I suspect more Scots will vote Stay this time round and Sturgeon has signed her own death warrant. #indyref2
— Allison Pearson (@allisonpearson) March 13, 2017
There is form here. A few days before the first independence referendum in 2014, the Welsh author also tweeted:
As my friend Lewis says, "When I murder Alex Salmond I want Judge Masipa at my trial." #OscarPistorius
— Allison Pearson (@allisonpearson) September 12, 2014
Pearson’s questionable language extends to personal insults. She takes a swipe at Sturgeon’s appearance in the recent article:
The love-child of a Bay City Roller and a Shetland Pony
Other commentators have also made vicious remarks about the First Minister. In 2015, columnist Katie Hopkins called for the death penalty against her:
Nicola Sturgeon is a short ginger poison dwarf. She might be a terrorist. Ginger people are not to be trusted.
She should get the death penalty just for being ginger and being Scottish.
The Telegraph and its columnist are normalising such speech on a powerful platform when there is an ongoing police investigation into death threats sent to Sturgeon. Police Scotland is looking into a “catalogue of horrific abuse” against the First Minister. These include death threats and violence but also “extremely offensive and sexualised insults”.
One example is ‘Steph Drysdale’, who tweeted:
If Nicola Sturgeon was in front of me I’d kick her f*cking head in and probably really enjoy myself doing so.
Another from ‘Brad’ reads:
Feel sorry for the poor husband of Nicola Sturgeon. She don’t shut up and f*ck me she’s proper pig ugly. Annoying f*cking troll.
Surely The Telegraph should be challenging such extreme speech, not standardising it.
Could you stop trying to incite nutters to kill our elected politicians?
Gratefully yours, Scotland.
— Lindsay Bruce (@RogueCoder250) March 14, 2017
Such publishing must be avoided. Especially with an online environment of death threats and hate speech. The language contributes to a violent worldview all too apparent from the murder of Jo Cox. The wrong person might read it.
Play your part in the ongoing media revolution by reading and supporting new media organisations that do better. Please add more that you like in the comments.
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, Salford Star
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?