A new report into the funding of free schools has said:
The system for funding new schools and new places in existing schools is increasingly incoherent and too often poor value for money.
This is particularly troubling for Theresa May. Especially in the run-up to an election. As although Labour’s Meg Hillier chairs the Public Accounts Committee that did the report, eight of its 15 members are Conservative MPs.
Taxpayers fund free schools, but they aren’t council run. People who operate free schools include charities, universities, faith groups, parents, and teachers. Proponents say that being able to create new schools gives parents and teachers the chance to open new ones if they are unhappy with the state option. Although of course many parents would argue that getting their children to school on time is difficult enough without also having to co-found said school.
People also criticise free schools for:
- Being likely to occur primarily in middle-class areas.
- Potentially creating a two-tier education system as already weak schools are further weakened.
- Not having to employ qualified teachers.
- Instances of fraud by people running free schools.
The committee’s report has found numerous issues. These include the placing of schools:
While the department is spending significant funds in creating 500 more free schools, even in areas with no shortage of places, existing schools struggle to live within their budgets and carry out routine maintenance.
There is no automatic link between a new school being granted permission to open and the need for a new school in an area.
It also raises the issues of choice, cost, and value:
It is not clear how much spare capacity is needed to provide parents with meaningful choice or how choice is being provided in those parts of the country that need it most. This is particularly important because free school places are more expensive – on average a place in a secondary free school costs 51% more than places provided by local authorities and a place in a primary free school costs 33% more…
In addition, the Department does not yet know whether the greater choice and competition created by free schools is improving educational standards.
The cost of new sites also draws criticism:
On average, the Department has paid nearly 20% more for land for free schools than official valuations.
And the neglect of existing schools:
There is insufficient focus on routine maintenance to keep school buildings in good condition and prevent more costly problems in the future.
Michael Gove introduced free schools under the Coalition government, but May has continued to support them. She has even extended the level of support, as the Spring Budget promised to build 140 more. This despite a damning report which showed millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money had been spent on brand new free schools that were ultimately left empty.
In this election, Theresa May is promising “strong and stable” leadership. But she is not delivering ‘stability’ in schools. The only thing that’s ‘strong’ is this government’s support for the landowners who sell us space at a massively inflated price.
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election. You can call 0300 200 3500 if you don’t have a national insurance number.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via screengrab
Since you're here ...
We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.