Think free hospital parking is a good idea? This guy thinks it could kill your gran [OPINION]

scream panic
John Shafthauer

In what could be the weirdest article of the election so far (although there’s still time), The Economist has published a piece criticising Labour’s plan for free hospital parking. A piece which suggests voting Labour is basically like holding down your poorly relative as Jeremy Corbyn beats them with The Communist Manifesto.

Parking

The author recounts a story in which he struggled to find a parking space at the Royal Free Hospital while his wife was in labour:

If somebody had at that moment offered me a parking space, I would gladly have taken it, no matter what the cost. Which helps to explain why Jeremy Corbyn’s proposal to abolish parking charges in English hospitals is such a lousy idea.

Although really, what it highlights is:

  1. The car park has been mismanaged. So manage it better.
  2. The car park is not sufficient for the prospective number of patients. So look to building more parking spaces or satellite hospital units.
  3. The car park is an example of how forced scarcity drives demand in a manner that allows capitalists to profit from people’s desperation.

Costing

The author continues:

The point of charging for parking is to control demand and avoid a commons tragedy, in which a finite resource is over-exploited to everyone’s detriment. Ideally, parking would be priced so that about one in ten spaces is unoccupied at any given time: that way, everybody who is prepared to pay for a space will quickly be able to find one.

We’ve highlighted the word ‘prepared‘ as it betrays the real issue here. It isn’t that people aren’t happy paying these fees. It isn’t that they’re a bit stingy. It’s that they are unable to afford it.

Because £3 an hour may not seem like much to some, but that isn’t the case for everyone. Especially if you’re having to make daily trips, as many of us have experienced.

Problems

The author goes on to explain why free parking is an issue that’s less traversable than Everest:

If English hospitals stopped charging, the car parks would quickly fill up—something that has happened even in relatively uncrowded Scotland, where hospitals do not normally charge. More visitors and staff would drive. And what would stop people from dropping off their cars at the hospital and popping round the corner for a bit of shopping?

You can probably work out solutions to most of these problems yourself. If it was a question on an IQ test, you’d probably think it was one of the easier ones.

Problem solving

In terms of staff, you simply tell them not to park in customer parking. Like many businesses already do.

In terms of visitors, the author worries that people dropping off patients may not be able to do so because of a lack of spaces. But this is easily avoidable. You just create short-term parking zones that give you 15 minutes to drop someone off. Like they already have at train stations.

In terms of people who are after free parking, a comment below the article highlights why this is also easily avoidable:

Very basic article, overlooking alternative, simple solutions.
In Wellington, NZ we have a system mentioned in one of the comments below, which works perfectly;
When you enter the carpark you take a ticket, when you leave you pay. However priority visits can get their ticket validated by staff, which makes parking free. For example I was visiting someone in intensive care, my parking was free. I was back again to visit a standard in patient (same person, they had recovered thankfully), and it was not.
Not that complicated a system.

It’s easy to imagine a variation of this in which all visitors have parking validated at reception. And anyone abusing the system does so knowing there will be a big fine if they get caught. Something which will be hard to avoid if they walk into the hospital, hand over their ticket, and then immediately head off to Sainsbury’s.

Capitalism is only looking out for your best interests?

The summary of the article is a great example of the sheer panic that ensues whenever anyone suggests a moderate change to the status quo:

If a hospital in a crowded city stopped charging, it would mean more frail, elderly people staggering into the accident and emergency ward on their own as their sons and daughters search for a space, more parents panicking as a child who has hit her head lolls in the back seat, and more labouring women leaning against railings.

The problems raised are easily solvable, though. And the shrieking, blinkered outrage we get every time someone suggests making life a little bit fairer shows why we need progressive politics more than ever.

Get Involved!

Register to vote in the 8 June general election. You can call 0300 200 3500 if you don’t have a national insurance number.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.

Featured image via Flickr

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed