The stand-off between Corbyn and a BBC Editor that put the broadcaster to shame [VIDEO]

Corbyn GE2017
Support us and go ad-free

The BBC’s John Pienaar attended an event where Jeremy Corbyn laid out his foreign policy vision on 12 May. And Pienaar’s exchange with Corbyn at the event provoked a universal groan from the audience. Because it revealed exactly how ugly our public broadcaster now is.

Press’ questions

After Corbyn’s speech, members of the press and the public were given a chance to pose questions. Pienaar asked:

What do you say to voters who support the British nuclear deterrent when you’ve made clear you would never order its use? Either first or in retaliation. You have made that clear, haven’t you?

And what do you say to supporters of British military power, when it’s not clear in what circumstances you would ever order forces into battle, in or out of NATO and including strikes against Islamic State?

Two other people also asked questions at that stage. And Corbyn answered them all together. He said the question of the UK’s security was “paramount” and confirmed that there are situations in which military force is necessary. And he gave the Second World War as an example of justifiable military action. Furthermore, he recalled a UN-backed intervention in East Timor that he said “worked”. But he asserted that such action should be done “on the basis of law” and “through the United Nations”.

He also explained that he had met with rape victims in the DRC, which is being used “an instrument of war” in that country. That experience, Corbyn said, was “the most traumatic and educative experience of my life”. And he suggested “we” could have done more to settle that conflict, and questioned whether the “economic interests” of some may explain why “we” didn’t.

It is “unilateral action”, however, that Corbyn said he ultimately questions.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Consequences of war

Corbyn then responded to a query about whether he’s ‘scared’ of being the UK’s commander-in-chief. He commented:

Not at all. I want to see a peaceful world. I’ve spent my life wanting to see a peaceful world. I’ve spent my life working for the human rights of all. And ensuring that everybody has some chance in life.

If you don’t mind, one slight anecdote. I met a group of refugees in a refugee camp in Syria, before the present conflict broke out. And these were people living in tents on the border of Iraq and Syria in appalling, appalling conditions. They deserved better.

And I was talking to this 14-year-old girl and her family… I said what do you want to achieve in your life? And this child, in a tent, in the middle of misery and everything else, she said ‘thank you for your question, I want to be a doctor’. Wow. She had ambitions.

You see those all over the world. And so the opportunity of leading a government that will help to promote international law, will address issues of global imbalance and insecurity, and will be realistic about terrorist threats, realistic about threats of cyber insecurity, is something that I actually relish. Because our task surely has to be to leave the world better and more peaceful for the next generation, rather than more dangerous and more at war…

The audience vigorously applauded these statements. Pienaar, however, had a slightly different reaction.

Rotting at the core

The BBC’s Deputy Political Editor – second only in rank to Laura Kuenssberg – was obviously not fully satisfied with Corbyn’s answer. So, he tried to shoehorn in another question. He began:

Mr Corbyn, Mr Corbyn… briefly for the sake of clarification… You mentioned the importance…

But Pienaar didn’t receive applause for his ‘intervention’. Instead, the audience groaned. Corbyn wouldn’t allow him to finish, and neither would the host – saying it was “unfair” to others. But what would Pienaar have asked? About the importance Corbyn had placed on human rights, people’s lives, safety and dreams? About the importance he’d placed on international law, diplomacy and “realistic” solutions throughout his speech?

Or was he about to demand more answers on Trident and the “British power” he spoke of at the start? The audience’s reaction suggested they expected it to be closer to the latter. And they universally rejected it. When given the choice between a foreign policy that places a value on life and another that values “power” above all else, the audience saluted the former.

And that’s a choice that the wider public will be faced with too, when they vote in the general election.

Watch the full event here:

Get Involved

Register to vote in the 8 June general election. If you don’t have a national insurance number, a 5 minute phone call on 0300 200 3500 will get it sent to you in ten days.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.

Featured image via Youtube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed