Unite leader Len McCluskey made headline news on 17 May for casting doubts on Labour’s ability to win at the general election. But either not reported or buried are the reasons why McCluskey made these claims – media bias. And in ignoring the crucial part of McCluskey’s interview, the mainstream media is, once again, revealing the very bias the Unite leader was talking about.
Speaking to Politico, McCluskey insisted Labour were “fighting for every seat” and that:
I believe that if Labour can hold on to 200 seats or so it will be a successful campaign. It will mean that Theresa May will have had an election, will have increased her majority but not dramatically.
He also stated:
Let’s wait and see what that turns itself into, in terms of percentage votes and seats.
But more significantly are the reasons why he said this. McCluskey accused the media of an “attack” on Corbyn, saying:
I think it’s going to be difficult because of the media bias to break that, but you never know. The truth is, wherever he goes … there are massive, massive crowds that turn out for him,
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
And this is the part that the media either buried or failed to mention at all.
What the media said
The mainstream media lapped up McCluskey’s words. The BBC’s headline was:
General election 2017: Len McCluskey ‘can’t see Labour winning’
And the supposedly neutral broadcaster entirely omitted his quoted words of “media bias”. Instead the BBC stated:
The union leader told Politico that a Labour victory on 8 June would be ‘extraordinary’ given the state of the party and criticism of it in the media.
But to this extrapolation is misleading, to say the least. McCluskey does not talk about the “state of the party”. The Politico article does reference his comments on the perception that Labour is divided and the problems over the leadership battle, but there are no direct quotes. And “criticism” is what a robust media should be doing to all political parties. But it is very different to outright bias, which is what McCluskey is accusing them of.
Sky News meanwhile ran with the headline:
Union boss Len McCluskey: Labour can’t win the election
But again, this isn’t exactly what McCluskey said. He said he thinks it will be difficult for Labour to win – not that the party can’t. Unlike the BBC, Sky News does manage to mention the words “bias” and “attack”. But they are buried towards the end of the article.
Meanwhile, the supposedly left-wing media isn’t much better. The Guardian covered the story with a headline that was at least accurate to McCluskey’s comments:
Success for Labour party would be 200 seats, says Len McCluskey
A union leader calling out media bias against the leader of of the main opposition party during an election should be major news. But it has either been buried or ignored. And it isnt just left-wing leaders who believe this. A letter from 68 media academics from universities around the country to write to The Guardian on 12 May, stating:
Our concern as media educators, however, is that whole sections of the media are already committed to a narrative that paints Labour as unelectable and Corbyn as a barely credible candidate.
And this is just yet another example. As The Canary previously reported, the BBC‘s coverage of the Labour manifesto was abysmal with political editor, Laura Kuenssberg failing to mention in her reporting of the £48.6bn tax increase that 95% of the population would not be affected. And it calls into question whether journalists are acting in self-interest in their reporting.
But with just under two weeks to go, Corbyn’s message is getting through, despite the best efforts of the media. He is attracting huge crowds and getting standing ovations from public sector workers. Labour is slowly eating into the Tories’ lead in the polls. And Labour’s manifesto promises are a message of hope to millions. But we need to keep pushing this message out. And the coverage of McCluskey’s comments is yet another example of how we need to bypass the mainstream media in order to do this.
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
-Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via Wikimedia
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop