Unite leader Len McCluskey made headline news on 17 May for casting doubts on Labour’s ability to win at the general election. But either not reported or buried are the reasons why McCluskey made these claims – media bias. And in ignoring the crucial part of McCluskey’s interview, the mainstream media is, once again, revealing the very bias the Unite leader was talking about.
Speaking to Politico, McCluskey insisted Labour were “fighting for every seat” and that:
I believe that if Labour can hold on to 200 seats or so it will be a successful campaign. It will mean that Theresa May will have had an election, will have increased her majority but not dramatically.
He also stated:
Let’s wait and see what that turns itself into, in terms of percentage votes and seats.
But more significantly are the reasons why he said this. McCluskey accused the media of an “attack” on Corbyn, saying:
I think it’s going to be difficult because of the media bias to break that, but you never know. The truth is, wherever he goes … there are massive, massive crowds that turn out for him,
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
And this is the part that the media either buried or failed to mention at all.
What the media said
The mainstream media lapped up McCluskey’s words. The BBC’s headline was:
General election 2017: Len McCluskey ‘can’t see Labour winning’
And the supposedly neutral broadcaster entirely omitted his quoted words of “media bias”. Instead the BBC stated:
The union leader told Politico that a Labour victory on 8 June would be ‘extraordinary’ given the state of the party and criticism of it in the media.
But to this extrapolation is misleading, to say the least. McCluskey does not talk about the “state of the party”. The Politico article does reference his comments on the perception that Labour is divided and the problems over the leadership battle, but there are no direct quotes. And “criticism” is what a robust media should be doing to all political parties. But it is very different to outright bias, which is what McCluskey is accusing them of.
Sky News meanwhile ran with the headline:
Union boss Len McCluskey: Labour can’t win the election
But again, this isn’t exactly what McCluskey said. He said he thinks it will be difficult for Labour to win – not that the party can’t. Unlike the BBC, Sky News does manage to mention the words “bias” and “attack”. But they are buried towards the end of the article.
Meanwhile, the supposedly left-wing media isn’t much better. The Guardian covered the story with a headline that was at least accurate to McCluskey’s comments:
Success for Labour party would be 200 seats, says Len McCluskey
A union leader calling out media bias against the leader of of the main opposition party during an election should be major news. But it has either been buried or ignored. And it isnt just left-wing leaders who believe this. A letter from 68 media academics from universities around the country to write to The Guardian on 12 May, stating:
Our concern as media educators, however, is that whole sections of the media are already committed to a narrative that paints Labour as unelectable and Corbyn as a barely credible candidate.
And this is just yet another example. As The Canary previously reported, the BBC‘s coverage of the Labour manifesto was abysmal with political editor, Laura Kuenssberg failing to mention in her reporting of the £48.6bn tax increase that 95% of the population would not be affected. And it calls into question whether journalists are acting in self-interest in their reporting.
But with just under two weeks to go, Corbyn’s message is getting through, despite the best efforts of the media. He is attracting huge crowds and getting standing ovations from public sector workers. Labour is slowly eating into the Tories’ lead in the polls. And Labour’s manifesto promises are a message of hope to millions. But we need to keep pushing this message out. And the coverage of McCluskey’s comments is yet another example of how we need to bypass the mainstream media in order to do this.
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
-Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?