Someone put The Guardian’s 36 most anti-Corbyn headlines all in one place. It’s not pretty [IMAGES]

Dump The Guardian

An apparent Jeremy Corbyn supporter has created a website detailing The Guardian‘s most anti-Corbyn headlines of the past two years.

Quite a list…

The website, called Dump The Guardian!, gives 36 examples of times when the paper has run negative stories about Corbyn. Some of the examples featured include:

Guardian One

Guardian Two

Guardian Three

Guardian Four

The articles included comment by regular Guardian columnists such as Jonathan Freedland, Polly Toynbee and Nick Cohen. And their opinions were often controversial.

Read on...

“Dismal, lifeless, spineless”

Toynbee, for example, wrote a column entitled Dismal, lifeless, spineless – Jeremy Corbyn let us down again. Discussing the result of the EU referendum, she noted:

Jeremy Corbyn faces an immediate leadership challenge after a performance that was dismally inadequate, lifeless and spineless, displaying an inability to lead anyone anywhere. What absence of mind to emphasise support for free migration on the eve of a poll where Labour was haemorrhaging support for precisely those metropolitan views.

Warning! Corbyn approaching!

Cohen, meanwhile, penned a piece called Don’t tell me you weren’t warned about Corbyn, in which he warned:

Next year, as austerity grinds on, as we crash out of the EU to find ourselves with Donald Trump as our last ally, [the Labour Party] will run candidates against Corbyn and ask for your support. That will be the moment when you need to look at your country and ask whether this was what you wanted when you first cheered “Jeremy” on. In my respectful opinion, your only honourable response will be to stop being a fucking fool by changing your fucking mind.

No more excuses?

And Freedland discussed how, a month before the election, Labour’s projected vote share was 27% in a piece called No more excuses: Jeremy Corbyn is to blame for this meltdown:

Blaming others won’t do. Instead, how refreshing it would be, just this once, if Corbyn and McDonnell put their hands up and took even a small measure of responsibility for this calamitous result. Instead of always playing the besieged victim, they could accept that, as Enoch Powell once observed, a politician complaining about the press is as absurd as a sailor complaining about the sea. Navigating a way through is simply what they have to do.

Oddly, all these columnists’ predictions appear to have been wrong. And as one social media user noted:


But The Guardian‘s open criticism of Corbyn runs deeper than a few opinion pieces. As The Canary previously reported:

On Tuesday 9 May, The Guardian published an astonishing yet predictable editorial regarding its opinion of the two main party leaders. And it was unequivocal in its conclusion: Theresa May, good; Jeremy Corbyn, bad.

To be fair to the paper, it has some consistently pro-Corbyn voices like Abi Wilkinson and Ellie Mae O’Hagan. And regular columnist Owen Jones has flip-flopped from supporting Corbyn to not; but he came out recently and apologised for doubting the Labour leader, saying:

I owe Corbyn, John McDonnell, Seumas Milne, his policy chief Andrew Fisher, and others, an unreserved, and heartfelt apology.

Falling down

This does not fully detract from the paper’s overly negative coverage of Corbyn. But it is worth noting the paper is also suffering financial difficulties. The Guardian‘s readership has fallen by 3% year-on-year. And on Sunday 11 June, news broke that its print edition will be turning into a tabloid design to save money. So it may be that the paper is intentionally trying to be ‘middle-of-the-road’ to appeal to as broad a readership as possible. In doing so, however, it has alienated much of its left-wing support.

You sometimes have to wonder whether The Guardian’s columnists live in the same world many of the rest of us do. And one tweet by freelance columnist Jane Merrick perhaps sums this up best:

Get Involved!

Read more from The Canary on the general election.

Join The Canary, and help us hold the mainstream media to account.

Featured image via screengrab

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed