Katie Hopkins is so toxic that The Daily Mail just disowned her

Support us and go ad-free

In an attempt to defend its good honour, The Daily Mail has launched a blistering attack against The Guardian. And among the bile-laced ‘we’re not hateful: you’re hateful!’ commentary, one piece of information stood out. Said info being that The Mail Online is not in fact an online version of The Mail. An assertion it seems to have made in order to distance itself from the controversial, hard-right columnist Katie Hopkins.

Separate entities

It came as a shock to some that the two entities are in fact separate. But that is apparently the case. As long as you can ignore the branding of their Twitter account:


Their staffing situation:


Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The Mail Online‘s web address:

The Mail font used on both:

The daily shared content that’s written by the same writers. With the following piece appearing on The Mail Online and today’s Daily Mail – the very same issue which asserts that the two entities are “totally separate”:

Mail Online
The Daily Mail

The owners, DMG Media:

And of course this clarification which can be found at the bottom of every Mail Online page:


What’s astonishing is that The Daily Mail has just publicly snubbed Katie Hopkins. It has pointedly not defended any criticism of its fellow media group employee and has instead held its hands up and said “she’s nothing to do with us”.

But how has Hopkins become so toxic that The Daily Mail needs to clarify that she does not write for it?


Hopkins recently left LBC Radio “effective immediately” after she apparently called for a “final solution” to Islam:

She later deleted this tweet and tweeted a version calling for a “true solution”. Hopkins stood by the original tweet, though. She also claimed to have changed it because of a typo (having written ‘Machester’ instead of ‘Manchester’):

The Guardian article linking Hopkins to The Daily Mail (not to be confused with The Mail Online) is thought to be written by Nesrine Malik:

Commentators have branded the likes of Hopkins and Tommy Robinson as “hate preachers” following the Finsbury Park attack. Writing on this subject, Malik said:

After the Manchester Arena attack, Katie Hopkins called for a ‘final solution’. She deleted her tweet and apologised for it, but it did not, to be frank, seem out of character. The fact that she is still employed by the Mail Online, occupied until recently a prime time slot on LBC and is defended vigorously on the grounds of freedom of speech is an illustration of the extent to which we apply double standards. The uncomfortable truth is that Hopkins and her ilk are given permission to spout invective because they are seen by some as ‘one of our own’ – and therefore in a different category, tolerated and excused.

Beginning of the end?

Hopkins has already lost one job. She’s seen as a prominent purveyor of the sort of anti-Islamic rhetoric that even the government is now calling ‘extremism’. She was accused of insulting Britain by telling Fox News that Londoners were “cowed and afraid” by terror. Fox News later itself branded Hopkins’ comments “reprehensible” after she called for internment camps. And The Daily Mail has just publicly snubbed her.

As Nesrine Malik said in response:

if the Daily Mail thinks Katie Hopkins is such a smear on its reputation then we should help them out and spread the message

It’s looking increasingly like the opportunistic Hopkins is no longer tenable as a mainstream media personality.

Get Involved

Support Hope not hate.

– You can also support The Canary.

– And read more articles about The Daily Mail here.

Featured image via YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed