Ahead of the general election, Jeremy Corbyn’s critics – whether Conservative, Labour or in the media – all believed one self-evident ‘fact’. Corbyn, they were sure, was a liability with the electorate. Some continue to argue that Labour did well in spite of, rather than because of, Corbyn. But now, politics lecturer Alia Middleton has crunched some numbers on the election. And her analysis, for the London School of Economics (LSE), includes one image that lays the truth bare:
The table shows what happened after party leaders visited constituencies held by their own parties. Theresa May and Corbyn visited a similar number of seats during the election campaign, says Middleton – 73 and 70 seats respectively, excluding their home constituencies. But in Labour seats visited by Corbyn, the Labour vote share rose by almost 19 percentage points; whereas in constituencies May visited, the Conservatives’ vote share actually fared slightly worse than in seats she didn’t visit.
In the end, it turned out that May was the liability and Corbyn the asset.
Academics also recently exploded another myth about Corbyn’s ‘unexpectedly’ successful election. Some MPs on the Labour right have argued that voters only ‘risked’ voting for Labour because they believed Corbyn would never win. But the British Election Study, which polled 30,000 voters, found that the opposite was true:
The more likely someone thought a Labour victory was, the more likely they were to vote Labour.
The assumption that Corbyn was a liability with the electorate infected the entire political and media class. The Conservatives gambled their campaign strategy on it – from the decision to call the snap election to the party’s complacent attacks on its own core voters in its manifesto. And so did Labour. Reportedly believing Corbyn would send the party to a catastrophic defeat, Labour HQ ran a defensive campaign, trying to protect seats they thought would fall to the Tories. It was often left to Momentum activists to campaign in marginal seats.
As veteran journalist Paul Mason put it a few days after the election:
2/~ Labour HQ's polling was way out; didn't detect the surge; so they directed campaigners away from winnable seats.
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) June 11, 2017
Meanwhile, some Labour candidates sought to distance their campaigns from Corbyn during the election. Joan Ryan wrote a letter asking her Enfield North constituents to vote for her “whatever your misgivings about the Labour leadership”. Peter Kyle, MP for Hove, went to his local paper to persuade voters that a vote for him was not a vote for Corbyn. Phil Wilson, MP for Sedgefield, published campaign leaflets that promised he was “no supporter” of Corbyn.
And media pundits shouted the Corbyn-as-liability trope from the rooftops. The New Statesman‘s Sarah Ditum sums up the fabricated hand-wringing best:
One of the most compelling arguments against Corbyn’s leadership is that he’s toxic to voters; but clause 1 of the Labour rulebook commits members to ‘promote the election of Labour Party representatives at all levels of the democratic process’. So do we promote the election of Corbyn, however hopeless we know it to be…? Or do we sit this one out, twisting our membership cards in our restless fingers?
But while his critics talked him down, Corbyn himself was out campaigning. And it turned out, as the table suggests, that the more voters actually got to see him free of the distorting prism of a hostile media, the more they liked him.
In the end, Corbyn’s Labour gained 30 seats, reversed decades of Labour decline, and won the biggest increase in the party’s share of the vote since 1945. And the evidence suggests that Labour did well because of Corbyn – and in spite of his critics. That’s something they would do well to remember whenever the next election is called.
– Read and support independent news outlets that hold the powerful to account. Here are some we recommend. Please add more that you like in the comments:
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?