Former First Minister of Northern Ireland Arlene Foster could appear in an Irish court over claims she blocked inquest funding for ‘politically motivated’ reasons. All political parties, including Foster’s DUP, had previously agreed to establish inquiries into unresolved past crimes. The DUP is currently propping up the Conservative government in the UK, under a ‘confidence and supply’ agreement.
Brigid Hughes has brought this new judicial review to court. The case comes in response to the failure of Northern Ireland’s Stormont government to request that the UK releases funding for the 44 outstanding legacy inquests. At Belfast High Court on September 27, Justice Paul Girvan added Foster to the list of respondents for the proceedings.
30 years seeking justice
Hughes was left widowed after her husband Anthony, an innocent bystander, was killed in an SAS ambush on the IRA in County Armagh in 1987. Anthony and his brother Oliver were returning home from work at the time. They were unwittingly caught up in the ambush and shot by SAS soldiers. Oliver survived but suffered serious injuries.
Funding needed for the legacy inquests is estimated at £10 million. The British government has said that the funds will be released subject to a formal request from the Northern Ireland government. But before the recent collapse of the power-sharing government in Northern Ireland, Foster refused to issue such a request.
A family torn apart
Speaking in 2014 about her struggle for justice, Hughes said:
For 27 years we have waited for the British Government to admit that my Anthony and his brother Oliver were totally innocent of any wrongdoing. They tried to blame my Anthony for being shot…..My three wee girls had to grow up without a daddy. I lost my husband and all these years they have tried to say that Anthony was in the wrong.
According to The Tyrone Times, media reports suggested that the two brothers were to blame for their own deaths. But the British government did issue an apology to the family after the SAS sought to justify their actions.
A ‘politically motivated’ decision
When Foster was a teenager, she herself survived an explosion on her school bus in 1988. No one has been prosecuted for the attack to date. Her father, a former Royal Ulster Constabulary policeman, survived an attempt on his life. Speaking about the killings during the Troubles, Foster said:
Victims sometimes struggle with some of the legacy issues. What one victim wants, another victim doesn’t want. They want something completely different, and it is about trying to find a structure that deals with all that.
Speaking about Foster’s refusal to sign off the funding request, Hughes’ barrister said:
The problem is that for political reasons the then first minister [Arlene Foster] blocked discussion of these proposals for political reasons and the Secretary of State has, for political reasons, decided not to release that money.
The UK government’s kingmaker in court
Responding to Hughes’ judicial review, Justice Girvan said:
If you’re presenting your case as a personal attack on her [Foster] as former first minister, I don’t think it would be fair to proceed without making her a party to proceedings and having legal representation.
The case is scheduled for a hearing on 27 November. And should Foster appear, it is difficult to envisage her giving a credible justification for her decision; she previously agreed to address unresolved past crime cases but then blocked the release of funding. She was a victim of the Troubles herself but she then impeded the legacy inquests.
Meanwhile, Hughes’ family continue their 30-year long struggle for justice.
– Support us, so we can continue to bring you the news that matters.
Featured image via Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?