Councillor Frank Fahy, the former mayor of Galway, attended a City Joint Policing Committee (JPC) meeting to discuss drug addiction and dealing. Fahy argued that a much more progressive policy is needed to address the city’s heroin problem. And so he suggested the establishment of supervised injection facilities (SIFs). These are centres where heroin users can inject in a safe environment.
Galway’s heroin problem
The use of heroin in this Irish city is evident in many ways. Residents have been victim to a spate of reckless ‘heroin-fuelled’ burglaries. Burglaries have increased by one-fifth this year. And it turns out many of the perpetrators – who are on Galway Gardai’s watchlist – are heroin users.
Residents say heroin use is prevalent near the Riverside Estate playing field. One local said:
Having heroin users based in a park where kids are playing and families are walking is crazy – just pure madness… I do feel sorry for them – like God love them it is a disease and they are in stuck in a rut of addiction, but this is not the place for them.
This resident said a lot of dealing also goes on in the area. In addition, there are many places in the city where used syringes, tinfoil, spoons and cooking pots can be found, not just near the Riverside Estate playing field. An area known as the ‘Plots’ in Woodquay is also littered with this drug paraphernalia.
The socioeconomic roots of drug addiction are also worth highlighting. Many families in Galway are in poverty. And a study has established a causal link between poverty and drug abuse. So while SIFs may be effective and necessary, they would treat the symptom of the problem rather than the cause.
The benefits of SIFs
SIFs could potentially tackle drug use in various ways. If users had a sterile facility they could go to, away from the public, then this would benefit both users and local residents.
Glasgow has already proposed a plan to open a SIF in order to reduce the harm associated with injecting heroin, including drug-related deaths, HIV and other injection-related complications. And as The Canary previously reported, France opened its first SIF in a Paris hospital. This followed data showing that 10% of drug users have HIV/AIDS and 40% have hepatitis C.
It may seem counterintuitive that creating a sanctioned centre for drug addicts to take an illegal drug would be beneficial. But the evidence so far has been promising. A systematic review [pdf] found that SIFs did not increase drug injecting, dealing or crime in the surrounding area. Instead, these centres are associated with decreased levels of public injections and dropped syringes.
There has increasingly been a push for a harm reduction approach to drugs in the UK. The Loop, a drug testing service, has been present at festivals such as Boomtown and Secret Garden Party. The charity aims to reduce harm by informing festival goers whether they have been mis-sold a drug. Staff can also tell users how strong the substance is.
But this harm reduction approach has not been met without criticism. The Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens debated the subject with Steve Rolles, Senior Policy Analyst at Transform Drug Policy Foundation. Hitchens is against drug testing at festivals because it is “a deliberate campaign to undermine the idea the law should be obeyed”. He is dismayed that the possession and use of illegal drugs is being tolerated in this way by the police force. It’s a “mockery of the law”, in his opinion.
Does the law need to be changed?
Perhaps this inconsistency between the law and reducing harm reveals why existing drug laws are out of date. As Rolles says:
Enforcement approaches have been tried with different levels of intensity all around the world and what there isn’t is any clear link between the intensity of enforcement and the level of use… What it does do is encourages risky behaviours and makes drugs more dangerous and drives people away from the kinds of health services that can actually help them reduce the risks they’re exposed to.
Of course, it’s the job of the police to enforce the law. But when the lives of people are at risk from the fact that drugs are illegal, maybe public safety should matter more than strict law enforcement.
– Check out more articles from The Canary on drug policy.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?