• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Friday, May 9, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

There’s a reason why a man was allowed to die from constipation. But no one wants to say it. [OPINION]

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
9 February 2018
in Editorial, Health, Other News & Features, UK
Reading Time: 5 mins read
169 9
A A
0
Home Editorial
330
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Thursday 8 February, a coroner ruled that there were “gross failings” from nearly every professional involved in the death from constipation of a man in November 2012. But some people on social media are asking ‘how could someone die from this?’

Well, in my opinion, professionals left this man with more than 22lb of faecal matter inside him (the equivalent of nearly 10 bags of sugar) for a very simple reason. And it’s because, in the quest for an independent life for a learning disabled man living with Down’s Syndrome, he ended up being treated as a third-class citizen.

Negligence?

Richard Handley, 33, died in Ipswich Hospital on 17 November 2012. On 15 November, surgeons removed 22lb, or nearly 10kg, of faecal matter from his abdomen, which was only a small amount of the total in his body. But as The Guardian reported, Richard died suddenly:

after a heart attack caused by inhaling his own liquid faeces, vomited up because his bowel was severely obstructed by faecal impaction. His abdomen was, one doctor noted, the size of that of a woman who was 40 weeks’ pregnant.

The coroner criticised all parties involved in Richard’s support: United Response, the supported/independent living provider where he resided; his GP practice; social workers and the council; his psychiatrist; and the staff at Ipswich Hospital. The coroner didn’t go as far as recording a verdict of death by negligence. But the way I see it, there was negligence – in two ways. One was a systematic failure, because no one would take responsibility for Richard’s support as a whole; this is something Richard’s family’s lawyer argued. But in my opinion, the larger area of neglect came from Richard’s supported living provider. And the case highlights that, for all the talk of learning disabled people living independently, little has changed.

Supported living versus residential care

Local authorities have gradually been replacing residential care with supported living. This is for learning disabled people, and those living with conditions like Down’s Syndrome and autism. As the website Created by Parents describes:

Supported living is the term given by Local Authorities to offer people their ‘own homes’ via a tenancy or home ownership or shared ownership and have personal and housing related support provided by an outside organisation.

Residential care is when someone lives in a registered care home which is managed and run by a care provider who is responsible for all aspects of their daily needs and wellbeing.

Richard had been living in Bonds Meadow residential care home since 1999. But in 2009, it began to change over to a supported living complex. And it was then, his family says, that things started to go wrong.

The social model of disability

Let me make this very clear: what is not at fault is the notion of independent living.

There should be nothing stopping learning disabled people from leading the lives they wish to. This is inherent to the social model of disability, an idea which states that it’s not people’s impairment that makes them disabled, but society (its attitudes and its constraints).

But what are at fault are supported living providers, which often hide under the wafer-thin guise of ‘charities’.

As the inquest heard, when his residential care changed to supported living, Richard’s family was told “he had the same right as anyone else to make unwise choices and eat unhealthily”. Richard had historical issues with constipation, something which had previously been managed by a controlled diet. But the provider appeared to stop that diet, and Richard died; all because of his “right” to “make unwise choices”.

A complex issue lies at the heart of Richard’s death. And it’s someone’s right to independent living versus someone’s right to support.

When is support not support?

Money is often providers’ ultimate motivator. So they often don’t give learning disabled people the time, emotional investment and ‘care’ to get their supported living right. Providers cut corners. They treat people as secondary to brand reputations. They often undervalue, underpay and undertrain their staff; they treat them as second-class citizens. And ultimately, professionals often see learning disabled people as third-class citizens, giving little thought to what are extremely complex lives.

No one who was being honest would say that all learning disabled people and those living with Down’s Syndrome and autism can make every single decision about their lives correctly. That is where the whole notion of ‘support’ comes in. But all too often, a lack of support is what leads to tragedy. And in Richard’s case, it seemed that a lack of support over his diet was the tragedy; paradoxically, his support workers probably thought they were giving him independence.

A balancing act

Supported living is a fine balancing act. It juggles people’s own self-will and their best interests as decided by a third party. And while the law allows for people’s ‘best interests‘ within the Mental Capacity Act, supported living providers overwhelmingly push people’s independence as far as they can, because it is cheaper that way. Providers too often view learning disabled people’s lives as ‘variables’ and things that need to be more ‘efficient’.

In Richard’s case, it was probably far more ‘efficient’ to leave him to choose whatever he wanted to eat. Because the time needed to support him in buying, preparing and cooking the right healthy food would have cost money in staff training and wages.

A tragic failure

Sadly, the drive for independent living coupled with financial motivation can cause human catastrophes.

The supported living model is a failure in spite of itself, not because of it. It does work – but it is people, companies and money that ultimately let it down. And the horrific and untimely death of Richard Handley is about as tragic as the cost of these failures can get.

Get Involved!

– Donate to the crowdfunder to support the cost of live-tweeting Richard’s inquest and similar cases.

– Support Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), fighting for disabled people’s rights.

Featured image via George Julian/screengrab

Share132Tweet83
Previous Post

Yeovil Hospital violates NHS Constitution in favour of privatisation, claims union

Next Post

At long last, John McDonnell lays bare how the Conservatives have transformed local government

Next Post
John McDonnell close-up

At long last, John McDonnell lays bare how the Conservatives have transformed local government

Theresa May at podium

Britain is sleepwalking into 1984, and we need to wake up. Now. [OPINION]

suffragettes with banners

While we’re celebrating suffragettes, children are being taught they were extremists [OPINION]

Conservative Cuts Kill

People are not OK that another Conservative MP is on the advisory board of a mental health charity [TWEETS]

Screengrab of Susie Colley talking to camera

Business leader admits she wants to ban homeless people because they're 'bad for profits' [VIDEO]

Protesters with Palestine flags and banners reading "Stop arming Israel" stand next to General Dynamics' sign.
News

Campaigners challenge Hastings Council over its complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza

by The Canary
9 May 2025
Women's cancers get 20% less funding than male cancers, despite much worse survival rates
News

Women’s cancers get 20% less funding than male cancers, despite much worse survival rates

by The Canary
9 May 2025
Labour 'seems intent on wielding scissors' to NHS as scale of budget shortfall revealed as £7bn this year
Analysis

Labour ‘seems intent on wielding scissors’ to NHS as scale of budget shortfall revealed

by Ed Sykes
9 May 2025
After the local elections, why don't politicians listen?
Opinion

After the local elections, why are politicians still not listening?

by Jamie Driscoll
9 May 2025
Labour MP Clive Lewis calls out worrying shadiness of US-UK tariff deal
Analysis

Labour MP Clive Lewis calls out worrying shadiness of US-UK tariff deal

by Ed Sykes
9 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

Protesters with Palestine flags and banners reading "Stop arming Israel" stand next to General Dynamics' sign.
News
The Canary

Campaigners challenge Hastings Council over its complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza

Women's cancers get 20% less funding than male cancers, despite much worse survival rates
News
The Canary

Women’s cancers get 20% less funding than male cancers, despite much worse survival rates

Labour 'seems intent on wielding scissors' to NHS as scale of budget shortfall revealed as £7bn this year
Analysis
Ed Sykes

Labour ‘seems intent on wielding scissors’ to NHS as scale of budget shortfall revealed

After the local elections, why don't politicians listen?
Opinion
Jamie Driscoll

After the local elections, why are politicians still not listening?

ADVERTISEMENT
Lifestyle
Nathan Spears

Why More People Are Seeking Legal Advice When Separating

Travel
Nathan Spears

Hungary Vignette Adventures: Discovering Hidden Gems by Car

How Social Media Affects the Mental Health of Young Adults Today
Tech
The Canary

How Social Media Affects the Mental Health of Young Adults Today