John Humphrys triggers outrage with his crass question about Stephen Hawking live on air

John Humphrys and Stephen Hawking
Support us and go ad-free

Across the world, people have paid tribute to Stephen Hawking. Fellow scientists described him as “unique”, a “genius” and “a beautiful mind”. But this wasn’t enough for BBC Radio 4 presenter John Humphrys. Interviewing scientists Brian Cox and Carlos Frenk, Humphrys asked the crassest possible question:

I wonder whether he was ever, or whether it was ever said of him in your profession, that he was cut a bit of slack because he was so desperately disabled.

Cox’s response was immediate:

No. Absoloutely not.


People took to Twitter to slam Humphrys’ attitude:

Others questioned whether it is actually Humphrys himself who is cut some slack due to his own privilege:

And many people argued that it’s time the BBC finally sacks him:

No excuses

There are no excuses for Humphrys’ line of questioning. Asking if one of the most brilliant minds for a generation was ‘cut some slack’ because of his disability is insulting, patronising and archaic.

People with disabilities have long fought for recognition on their own merits. And Hawking is one of many people who provide a shining example of the fact that disability is not a barrier to brilliance.

This line of questioning has no place anywhere. Let alone on the BBC. Surely it’s time to get this over-privileged, overpaid man off our airwaves for good.

Get Involved!

Support Disabled People Against Cuts.

Featured image via Flickr/Lwp Kommunikáció and screengrab

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed