Before Prof Stephen Hawking died, the renowned physicist was preparing to take Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt to court for destroying the NHS. Hawking said the Conservatives’ privatisation agenda amounted to an “attack on the fundamental principles of the NHS”.
The legal case
Hawking joined JR4NHS – a campaign group made up of concerned healthcare professionals. Together, they were carrying out legal action to stop “the introduction of accountable care organisations (ACOs) without full public consultation and parliamentary approval”.
Fundamentally change the NHS and involve a radical reorganisation of health and social services in England. They will have control over the allocation of NHS and taxpayers’ money.
Labour’s shadow health secretary Jon Ashworth said ACOs were “potentially the biggest change which will be made to our NHS for a decade”. Still, the Conservative government is pushing ahead without a public consultation. And ACOs are just part of the alphabet soup of new structures the government wants to impose on the NHS.
Hunt loses attempt to stop Hawking and the campaigners
Hawking and the campaigners already won a major victory over Hunt. The Health Secretary and NHS England “fiercely” attempted to price out the campaigners [see ‘Case updates’] from bringing the legal challenge. But on 22 February, the High Court ruled that the costs would be capped. This means that, after a crowdfunding campaign, JR4NHS can have the judicial review into ACOs heard. It’s scheduled for 23 and 24 May.
“Towards a US-style insurance system”
We must prevent the establishment of a two-tier service, with the best medicine for the wealthy and an inferior service for the rest. International comparisons indicate that the most efficient way to provide good healthcare is for services to be publicly funded and publicly run.
We see that the direction in the UK is towards a US-style insurance system, run by the private companies, and that is because the balance of power right now is with the private companies.
International comparisons do suggest Hawking is correct. In 2014, the US spent 17.1% of its GDP on healthcare – without providing cover to all Americans. In the same year, the UK spent just 9.1% of its GDP on healthcare, while providing universal cover. The major difference across the Atlantic is that private companies are making huge profits. Whereas if healthcare is public, privateers cannot siphon money out of the service as profits.
The NHS was a service close to Hawking’s heart. Now the legendary scientist is no longer with us, it’s all the more important we fight NHS commercialisation. Otherwise, the Hawkings of the future may fall by the wayside because they cannot afford decent healthcare.
– You can also take action with Keep Our NHS Public.
– And furthermore support us if you appreciate the work we do.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop