BREAKING: Extraordinary scenes at the High Court as participants and lawyers walk out of spying inquiry
A mass walkout happened at the High Court on 21 March. Those involved in the Undercover Policing Inquiry and their lawyers left the court after an hour to show no confidence in its chairperson, John Mitting. Although I wasn’t able to attend the hearing today, I am a core participant in it and was one of those who instructed my lawyer to leave the hearing.
The hearing
The hearing was the latest in a series of anonymity applications for former Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) officers. These are the officers who spied on protest groups between 1968 and 2006.
A series of tweets from the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance (COPS), quoting Phillippa Kaufmann – the barrister for those spied on, shows why those of us involved in the inquiry no longer have any faith in it or its chairperson:
Phillippa Kaufmann QC speaks to Mitting for #spycops victims: we have expressed increasing concerns about your conduct. It has come to a head. We have problems with disclosure and yourself.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
Kaufmann: we want inquiry to be as open as possible. Without it you can't take decisions on an informed basis. We need to test #spycops assertions but are prevented.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
Kaufmann: You have never once explained why you dismiss our representations about #spycops anonymity.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
Those involved in the inquiry have also lost faith in Mitting due to comments he made about married officers in a previous hearing:
Kaufmann: You said officer HN58 didn't abuse his power because he had been married for a long time. We challenged it, you said you were "perhaps old fashioned". Despite this, you maintained your view & granted anonymity.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
"We have the usual white, upper middle class eldery gentleman, who's life experience has nothing in common with people spied upon" Kuafmann to Mitting to cheers and clapping from the gallery #spycops
— Tom Fowler (@tombfowler) March 21, 2018
Kaufmann then issued the demands of those of us involved in the inquiry:
Kaufmann: the victims don't want an inquiry presided over by someone naive & old fashioned. They have no confidence on you. They ask that you step down, or bring about a true panel of others that understand the subject & experience of the issues.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
The walkout
Kaufmann explained her instructions and was met with applause from the public gallery:
Kaufmann: I am instructed together with my team to leave the hearing.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
Kaufmann draws huge applause. With that, Kaufmann and her team and the entire public gallery have walked out of the hearing. Mitting is beetroot faced.
— COPS (@copscampaign) March 21, 2018
Journalists attending the hearing were shocked:
Blimey – #spycops victims and legal team walked out of the inquiry after a devastating no confidence attack on the “naive and old fashioned” chair, judge John Mitting https://t.co/VtjtuOAhLV
— Kevin Maguire (@Kevin_Maguire) March 21, 2018
Those who left the hearing also blockaded the front of the court:
#spycops campaigners have walked out and have blocked the entrance to the Royal Courts of Justice pic.twitter.com/zpT3HPwh89
— Netpol (@policemonitor) March 21, 2018
Drastic but necessary
The decision to walk out of the hearing was not taken lightly. But those of us involved feel like we no longer have a choice. Mitting is blocking access to justice for those of us who were spied upon at every step of the way. He is allowing evidence that we are not allowed to see or challenge that has been generated by people who lied for a living.
We are the people who have been spied on. We are the people who have had our trust abused; who have been tricked into relationships and had our lives intruded into by the police. The inquiry was supposed to give us answers as to why this was allowed to happen. But under Mitting this isn’t happening, and it isn’t likely to happen.
The only way confidence can be restored in the inquiry is for Mitting to step down.
Get Involved!
– Support the COPS campaign.
– Support Police Spies Out of Our Lives.
– Support the Network for Police Monitoring.
Featured image via Netpol
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
