The BBC has just allowed a former Conservative foreign secretary to accuse Jeremy Corbyn of being a danger to national security. But it failed to tell listeners that Malcolm Rifkind had left politics in disgrace.
Rifkind stood down as an MP in 2015 after Channel 4 exposed him offering ‘cash for access’ to what he thought were foreign companies. But the BBC clearly didn’t think that affected his credibility on matters of national security. Only a few hours after Rifkind appeared on BBC Newsnight to defend Boris Johnson from charges of lying to the public over the Salisbury poisonings, he was back, this time on the Today programme.
‘On the same side as the Russians’
Rifkind was keen to paint Corbyn as a Russian sympathiser. Asked by presenter Justin Webb whether Corbyn should be given intelligence briefings about the Salisbury poisonings, Rifkind replied:
I’m not so sure about that, frankly, because, you know, he’s already made up his mind, he’s already saying that he’s on the same side essentially as the Russians on this particular matter.
Pressed further as to whether Corbyn should be allowed to see the evidence if he asks for it, Rifkind said:
I don’t necessarily have a strong view on that because, frankly, Mr Corbyn’s rather doubtful in terms of the way he deals with issues of this kind.
“Useful access” to a foreign company
Webb failed to raise Rifkind’s own “doubtful” history during the interview. In February 2015, Channel 4 Dispatches secretly filmed Rifkind offering to use his position as an MP to arrange “useful access” in return for payment of at least £5,000 a day. He boasted to what he thought was a Chinese company:
I am involved with the World Economic Forum, Davos, and they have a number of specialist committees – one of which looks at nuclear security, nuclear weapons security. I was a defence minister so it’s an area that I have some interest in, so I have contacts in that area as well.
Rifkind was suspended from the Conservative Party and resigned as chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee. He called Channel 4‘s claims “contemptible” but nonetheless stood down at the general election a few months later. An enquiry [pdf, p47] by Ofcom (the UK broadcasting regulator) into the Dispatches programme found that Channel 4 had fairly represented Rifkind’s views.
Twitter users were quick to point out the irony of Rifkind accusing Corbyn of being untrustworthy:
The question NOT asked on @BBCr4today
“Sir Malcolm Rifkind, your own political career ended in disgrace, how do you dare say that intelligence which has been shared with 27 other countries should be withheld from the leader of a party which received 40% of the votes at the GE?”
— Tom London (@TomLondon6) April 6, 2018
Malcolm Rifkind, also an ex-foreign secretary, and chair of intelligence & security select committee, boasted to disguised journalists he could offer “useful access” to every British ambassador in world, because of his status.
Now *that's* what a 'security risk' looks like 💅
— Mrs Gee #GTTO (@earthygirl01) April 6, 2018
Malcolm Rifkind? Discredited Malcolm Rifkind? Cash for access Malcolm Rifkind? This is who the BBC go to, not once but twice, for comments on #Salisbury They're just laughing at us now. #BBCBias #NotFitForPurpose
— Sue McCormick (@LadyBrainSueMcC) April 6, 2018
In 2015, as Chair of the sensitive House of Commons Intelligence and Security Committee, Malcolm Rifkind was caught in a sting offering his 'services' to the Chinese for cash.
Yet he claims Jeremy Corbyn is a threat to national security?#DoTheyThinkWeAreStupid
— Tom Pride (@ThomasPride) April 6, 2018
Is this the same Malcolm Rifkind who was willing to sell ministerial access to foreigners who considers Corbyn a security risk? #r4today
— p c bot (@hoddles10) April 6, 2018
I’m no Corbynite, but Malcolm Rifkind’s comments about Corbyn this morning were bordering on slanderous I would have thought. A walking talking Daily Express headline.
— Francis Denning (@francis_denning) April 6, 2018
Corbyn government makes Rifkind “tremble”
Webb asked Rifkind if he was suggesting that it could be dangerous to give Corbyn information about the Salisbury attacks. He replied:
I am saying that Mr Corbyn’s whole approach on matters of national security leave a huge gap to be desired, and the idea that somebody like that might one day be in Downing Street makes me tremble if I even thought it was serious.
And there you have it. A disgraced Conservative MP invited onto the BBC to attack Jeremy Corbyn. Welcome to BBC impartiality.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?