A key manifesto pledge by Lambeth Labour Party was looking distinctly tatty on Tuesday 24 April.
A local media outlet has exposed the reality of a pledge Lambeth Labour made to build 1,000 more council homes at the last local elections in 2014. Because Lambeth Council under Labour has actually built just 17 council houses.
As BrixtonBuzz reminded its readers, Lambeth Labour pledged in 2014:
Then, in 2016, it said:
In its 2018 manifesto, Lambeth Labour says:
At the last council election we pledged to build 1,000 extra homes at council rent by 2019. By early 2018 we had over 950 homes completed, being built or already approved by Lambeth’s cabinet meaning that we will complete our ambitious programme of building 1,000 extra homes at council rent for local families.
And it was still pushing the 1,000 homes claim on 21 April:
We're delivering 1,000 new council homes and we've invested £490m in repairing and improving tenants' homes. The Tories on the other hand… pic.twitter.com/tzKzQZZ5Eo
— LambethLabour (@LambethLabour) April 21, 2018
But a Freedom of Information request (FOI) by BrixtonBuzz revealed that the council had built just 17 council homes for secure council tenancies between June 2014 and March 2018:
What’s more, the council itself only plans to build another 215 new council homes for ‘council rent’, under both its banner and that of its not-for-profit vehicle Homes for Lambeth [xls, table ‘data’, column I, rows 3-59]. The remainder of the 959 homes marked as “council rent” will be built by housing associations/property developers, or are existing council rent homes on estates that are being ‘regenerated’.
So in total, the council itself has built, or will build, 232 new council homes at council rent.
But as BrixtonBuzz explained, all is still not what it seems with Lambeth Labour’s housing plans:
Lambeth Labour Councillors use the term “council houses” and “homes for council-level rent” interchangeably. They are very different types of tenancy.
The former means a home with a secure council tenancy. Whereas the latter means a home with a standard assured tenancy, with no rights of a secure tenancy.
Lambeth Council says…
A spokesperson for the council told The Canary:
The council has an ambitious commitment to deliver 1,000 new homes at council rent, through direct delivery, agreements with developers and through the 100% council-owned company Homes for Lambeth.
The council has completed nine social rented units at Akerman Road, in autumn 2016, and a private developer completed a further eight social rented units as an Offsite Planning Gain Section106 Contribution at St Oswald’s Place in May 2016. In addition, 70 additional social rent homes will open later this year at Lollard Street and new homes are under construction as part of the Your New Town Hall project in Brixton.
A further 255 social rent homes have been completed by registered providers since 2014. In total, over 950 homes have been constructed, given planning permission or agreed at Cabinet since 2014.
The Green Party: not impressed
The Green Party, meanwhile, has hit back. Its co-leader Jonathan Bartley told The Canary:
Over the last four years, Lambeth Council has made tens of millions by destroying local housing co-ops and selling the homes to developers. To find that it has only built 17 homes over this period adds insult to the great injury it has done to those in desperate need of homes. It also calls into question the council’s whole approach to housing which as things stand will involve the destruction of communities and social cleansing of six estates in Lambeth.
In December 2016, Jeremy Corbyn posed with Lambeth councillor and ‘regenerator-in-chief’ Matthew Bennett. Nestled between them was the 1,000 homes pledge:
— Matthew Bennett (@CllrMattBennett) December 15, 2016
It might be time for Corbyn to start thinking through his photo opportunities a bit more carefully.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via Lambeth Labour – screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?