The DWP just made a damning admission about benefit assessments

A ripped brown envelope and the DWP logo

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has released the results of a claimant survey. It shows that one of its key policies could be failing hundreds of thousands of people.

The DWP: a controversial policy

Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a welfare payment to help with the additional costs of sickness/disability. It was first rolled out in April 2013, to replace Disability Living Allowance (DLA). But since its started, PIP has been dogged by controversy; not least the assessment process.

Now, the DWP has released the results of a claimant survey about assessments. Buried in the report are the findings for the actual assessment. They show that a significant number of claimants had issues with their face-to-face assessments.

Some damning results

The first question is about the assessment’s content. It found that in four out of the five areas looked at, over a fifth of claimants had problems:

PIP claimants survey results table one

The next question was about the assessor. Over a fifth of people asked had problems in two areas:

PIP claimants survey results table two

Read on...

The DWP also found 44% of people thought the assessment was “as they expected”. Whether people’s expectations were good or bad is impossible to quantify as the DWP gave no measure for people to rate it against. So this result is essentially meaningless.

But what was telling is that 26% of people said the face-to-face assessment was “more difficult” than expected; because:PIP claimants survey results table three

But the DWP survey threw up one more issue on the process. 31 claimants (3%) said that they were not able to properly explain how their condition affected them on the form or at the face-to-face assessment.

In reality… 

So, why does this survey matter?

The DWP says the results have a 95% confidence interval; that is, if the results were applied to everyone on PIP, in 95 out of 100 cases the survey results would not change by much. Specifically, for results like the ones above that are 30% or less, the DWP says the results would only change either way by 2.6-2.7 percentage points.

The Canary has therefore applied the survey results to the 3,401,000 PIP the DWP signed off on between April 2013 and April 2018. This means that during the PIP face-to-face assessment:

  • 714,000 claimants didn’t have enough time to explain how their condition affects them.
  • 884,000 claimants thought the measurements and tests were not relevant or appropriate.
  • Again, 884,000 claimants thought the questions did not allow them to explain how their condition affected their daily life.
  • 816,000 claimants didn’t think the questions were relevant or appropriate to their condition.
  • 748,000 claimants thought the assessor didn’t understand their form, supporting evidence or listened to them.
  • 884,000 claimants found the process more difficult than they expected.

These figures, based on the DWP confidence interval, could vary by up to 100,000 people either way. But it still means that the PIP assessments have failed hundreds of thousands of sick and disabled people.

Finally, if the 31 claimants who said neither the form or the assessment allowed them to explain how their condition affected them was applied to all PIP claims, then the process could have completely failed around 100,000 people.

By anyone’s measure, the survey shows the DWP’s assessment process is seriously flawed.

The Canary contacted the DWP for comment but had not received a reponse at the time of publication.

Get Involved!

– Support the blogs Universal Credit SuffererPolitics and Insights and The Poor Side of Life and get involved with Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), fighting for disabled people’s rights.

Featured image via The Canary and UK government – Wikimedia 

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed