The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has released the results of a claimant survey. It shows that one of its key policies could be failing hundreds of thousands of people.
The DWP: a controversial policy
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a welfare payment to help with the additional costs of sickness/disability. It was first rolled out in April 2013, to replace Disability Living Allowance (DLA). But since its started, PIP has been dogged by controversy; not least the assessment process.
Now, the DWP has released the results of a claimant survey about assessments. Buried in the report are the findings for the actual assessment. They show that a significant number of claimants had issues with their face-to-face assessments.
Some damning results
The first question is about the assessment’s content. It found that in four out of the five areas looked at, over a fifth of claimants had problems:
The next question was about the assessor. Over a fifth of people asked had problems in two areas:
The DWP also found 44% of people thought the assessment was “as they expected”. Whether people’s expectations were good or bad is impossible to quantify as the DWP gave no measure for people to rate it against. So this result is essentially meaningless.
But the DWP survey threw up one more issue on the process. 31 claimants (3%) said that they were not able to properly explain how their condition affected them on the form or at the face-to-face assessment.
So, why does this survey matter?
The DWP says the results have a 95% confidence interval; that is, if the results were applied to everyone on PIP, in 95 out of 100 cases the survey results would not change by much. Specifically, for results like the ones above that are 30% or less, the DWP says the results would only change either way by 2.6-2.7 percentage points.
The Canary has therefore applied the survey results to the 3,401,000 PIP the DWP signed off on between April 2013 and April 2018. This means that during the PIP face-to-face assessment:
- 714,000 claimants didn’t have enough time to explain how their condition affects them.
- 884,000 claimants thought the measurements and tests were not relevant or appropriate.
- Again, 884,000 claimants thought the questions did not allow them to explain how their condition affected their daily life.
- 816,000 claimants didn’t think the questions were relevant or appropriate to their condition.
- 748,000 claimants thought the assessor didn’t understand their form, supporting evidence or listened to them.
- 884,000 claimants found the process more difficult than they expected.
These figures, based on the DWP confidence interval, could vary by up to 100,000 people either way. But it still means that the PIP assessments have failed hundreds of thousands of sick and disabled people.
Finally, if the 31 claimants who said neither the form or the assessment allowed them to explain how their condition affected them was applied to all PIP claims, then the process could have completely failed around 100,000 people.
By anyone’s measure, the survey shows the DWP’s assessment process is seriously flawed.
The Canary contacted the DWP for comment but had not received a reponse at the time of publication.
Featured image via The Canary and UK government – Wikimedia
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?