Others, like the home secretary, have used the occasion to launch political attacks:
Wishing all Jews in UK & abroad a very happy #RoshHashanah. At a time when British Jews understandably (and sadly) feeling under threat from @jeremycorbyn, more important than ever for all decent people to stand together and celebrate our Jewish community. #ShanahTova
— Sajid Javid (@sajidjavid) September 7, 2018
One Twitter account pointed out the issue with Javid’s tweet:
The Home Secretary’s Tweet for Jewish New Year – Suggesting that those who support Corbyn are not 'decent'. He's used a Jewish festival in order to make a political point, which includes saying that Jews who support Corbyn are bad Jews
— Jewish Socialist (@JewishSocialist) September 7, 2018
Other Jewish people have taken offence at what Javid has done. Among them were the actor David Schneider and the author Michael Rosen:
Hey Sajid. Just to let you know that it’s not a traditional Rosh Hashanah gift to be used as a political football and by the way how you getting on with the Islamophobia and racism in your own party? https://t.co/SkBvomKf7c
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) September 7, 2018
I agree. After all, he's not only Sajid Javid, and not only a Tory politician. He's the Home Secretary for the whole country. Instead of behaving like that, he's in effect said, I am not passing on 'our' good wishes to you Corbyn-supporting Jews. He's used the festival. https://t.co/WTFF0D2rtx
— Michael Rosen (@MichaelRosenYes) September 7, 2018
Antisemitism is a problem in the UK. While it’s important to acknowledge and tackle antisemitism on the left; it’s equally important to point out it’s not specific to the left, and that the issue is being used opportunistically.
Much of the criticism of Labour came after the NEC changed the wording of some of the examples that accompany the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Although Labour has now adopted the examples in full, some people in Labour worried they could be used to stifle debate on Israel. Other’s disagreed.
Labour members were not alone in worrying about the suppression of debate. The use of this definition has been criticised by the person who devised it, Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups, and several Jewish groups.
Notably, at the height of the criticism of Labour, the Conservative Party made no mention of IHRA in its rulebook. It didn’t even mention antisemitism, while Labour referenced it three times. As FactCheck wrote on 20 July:
it’s important to remember that the scandal surrounding Labour is about whether and how it defines antisemitism in its party rules. It is difficult for Theresa May to criticise the Labour [Party] on this front – as she did on Wednesday in parliament – when her own party has not specifically mentioned antisemitism in any of its official documents or rulebook.
The Conservatives’ code has since been amended.
There are several other reasons to doubt the Tories’ sincerity when it comes to anti-racism. The responses to Javid’s tweet highlighted several of them:
The Windrush scandal shone a light on the Conservative’s ‘hostile environment‘ against non-white Britons. As a result of that scandal, Amber Rudd was forced to resign as home secretary. Her replacement was none other than Sajid Javid. Since taking the job, he has drawn criticism for:
- Using his position to dismiss Muslim groups who are reporting “more than weekly occurrences of Islamophobia” in the Conservative Party.
- Voting to ensure that documents which show how much the government knew about the Windrush scandal remain secret.
- ‘Buying the silence‘ of victims of the Windrush scandal – namely by using non-disclosure agreements with compensation payments.
Baroness Warsi, the former co-chair of the party, claims that Tory Islamophobia is:
very widespread. It exists right from the grassroots, all the way up to the top.
I don’t think it’s something that Theresa [May] is a part of, but I do believe it is something the leadership feels can be easily ignored.
The Conservatives are ignoring racism in their own party while attempting to weaponise people’s fear of antisemitism. Thankfully, the response to Javid’s message shows that people aren’t falling for it.
– You can also join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?