• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, June 6, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Stephen Barclay demonstrated ground-breaking stupidity on Brexit when discussing the backstop

Peadar O'Cearnaigh by Peadar O'Cearnaigh
22 September 2019
in Analysis, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
167 5
A A
0
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

On 19 September, the Brexit secretary Stephen Barclay spoke at a Europa Press breakfast in Madrid. And not for the first time, Barclay showed that Conservative ministers just don’t seem to understand the effects of Brexit.

So one Irish journalist aptly placed his comments near the top of a list that nobody would want to be on:

 

The number of idiotic speeches by senior British ministers on Brexit over the last three years is long, but ⁦⁦@SteveBarclay⁩ contribution in Madrid today is one for the Top Ten #brexit https://t.co/HSfcDk79sK

— Mark Hennessy (@MarkHennessy) September 19, 2019

Conservative doublespeak

In speaking about the notorious backstop agreement, Barclay explained that the backstop agreement had to go:

because the backstop has failed to achieve the consent of both communities in Northern Ireland.

But if we follow Barclay’s rationale then Brexit, for the north of Ireland at least, also has to go. Because almost 56% of the population in the north voted to remain in the EU at the 2016 referendum. This means Brexit doesn’t have the support of both communities either. So Barclay’s rationale of rejecting the backstop has to be equally applied. This could leave the north with no other option but to join the south of Ireland.

The numbers have increased since then

Furthermore, a recent poll shows almost 60% of people living in the north favoured having a border in the Irish Sea as opposed to having one on the island of Ireland, post-Brexit. They see this as a compromise solution to avoid ‘losing up to 40,000 job and damaging food and farming sectors’. So the majority do favour the backstop.

Over 80% of the people surveyed in that poll believe the British government is handling Brexit negotiations badly. Additionally, a DUP supporter who had publicly backed the DUP Brexit position now says he ‘regrets voting Leave’. As a farmer, he fears the negative consequences of no-deal.

The dreaded backstop

The backstop is one of the main obstacles to a Brexit solution. It’s “a legal guarantee to avoid a hard border under all circumstances” after the UK exits the EU on 31 October. So it would mean no hard border on the island of Ireland.

And it means the UK could remain in a “single customs territory” for a period. This is something which the Conservative government and its DUP allies say they oppose. There does appear to be a softening of that position in recent days, though, as previously reported by The Canary. So Barclay’s position makes even less sense.

The Good Friday Agreement

Barclay also said:

It is inconsistent with the Belfast / Good Friday Agreement [GFA]– the very thing it claims to protect.

But the UK attorney general Geoffrey Cox refuted this notion back in December 2018. Barclay claimed this despite the fact that it’s his own party’s confidence and supply agreement with the DUP that actually runs counter to the GFA. After all, the DUP represents one particular identity and tradition in the north. The peace agreement states:

the power of the sovereign government with jurisdiction there shall be exercised with rigorous impartiality on behalf of all the people in the diversity of their identities and traditions

Return to violence?

Barclay stating that the backstop is inconsistent with the GFA is not only ill-informed, it’s also potentially dangerous. It could heighten tensions in the north. Because if he’s suggesting the backstop must go because it doesn’t have the support of both communities, then so too does Brexit. And that could result in the north being forced into a united Ireland – something loyalist extremists would potentially resist.

So his comments could fuel the claims from unelected loyalists who say a terrorist organisation like the UVF is watching Brexit negotiations “very closely”. But thankfully, for the time being at least, democratically elected loyalists have refuted this nonsense.

So Barclay’s speech is not only “idiotic”, but it’s also potentially dangerous.

Featured image via YouTube – UK in Spain / Flickr – Christolph Scholz

 

Tags: BrexitIrelandNorthern Ireland
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Jeremy Corbyn calls out Andrew Marr’s bias straight to his face

Next Post

Johnson declines to deny allegations he failed to declare potential conflicts

Next Post
Boris Johnson

Johnson declines to deny allegations he failed to declare potential conflicts

McDonnell backs ‘logical’ approach to delay on Labour Brexit policy

Jimmy Wales and an English private school

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales launches the most bizarre attack on Labour’s vote to abolish private schools

Thomas Cook plane

The numbers behind Thomas Cook's collapse lift the lid on capitalism and Tory greed

McDonnell sets out Labour plan for 32-hour working week

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Filton 24
Skwawkbox

Thousands sign complaint ahead of hearing to remove ‘biased’ Filton judge

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
Pogoń Szczecin
Skwawkbox

“Ethics more important”: Polish football club rejects Maccabi Tel Aviv transfer offer

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
Corbyn
Skwawkbox

Corbyn: Filton activists must not be sentenced as terrorists

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
Sefton
Analysis

Indy-Green relationship boosted Sefton’s left-wing election surge

by Ed Sykes
6 June 2026
Anthropic
Global

US spy agency using Anthropic AI tech for cyberwar against China and Iran

by Joe Glenton
5 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart