The Tories’ coronavirus plan has paid off. We’re now blaming each other for this mess.

Boris Johnson coronavirus
Support us and go ad-free

It seems that the Conservative government’s approach to the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic has paid off. Because the latest YouGov polling shows the majority of the public would blame each other if there was a second wave – not the Tories’ chaotic handling of the crisis.

The coronavirus blame-game has reached its climax

On Tuesday 4 August, YouGov released the results of its “daily question” survey. And as it tweeted, 52% of people ‘would hold the public most responsible’ if there was a second coronavirus wave:

 

By The Canary‘s calculations, if you removed the “neithers” and “don’t knows”, this would mean that the polling would be 62% blaming the public and 37% blaming the government.

Looking at the YouGov survey in detail, and across age groups the ‘blame the public’ answer had the majorities, albeit very slim ones for people between 18-49 years. The results across political parties were predictable. Most Tory voters blamed the public, most Labour voters blamed the Tories, and the Lib Dems sat on the fence; much like the years of the coalition government, then. EU referendum ‘Leave’ voters blamed the public by 67%, while ‘Remainers’ were divided – 42% the public and 44% the government.

Chaotic Tory ‘leadership’

The results are not surprising. Because the Tories’ handling of the pandemic has been driven by three main mantras:

  • ‘Do as I say, not as I do’; Dominic Cummings’ road trip to Durham being the prime example.
  • ‘More flip-flops than Brighton beach’. The government’s chaotic approach has seen it repeatedly send out mixed and muddled messages and contradictions. For example, the switch from “stay home” to the meaningless “stay alert” catchphrase.
  • ‘That’s another fine mess the public have got us into!’. The Tories have repeatedly rolled out narratives that the pandemic is our (the public’s) responsibility to manage, not theirs.

So, it seems that for many people, the rot has sunk in – and that we’ve only got ourselves to blame if there’s a second coronavirus wave. But breaking the YouGov results down into social grade, and they show an already worrying trend across UK politics that has developed further. That is, the divide and conquer of the working classes.

Divide and conquer

Social grade is a way of splitting society into different social and economic groups. As UK geographics describes, there are four brackets of social grade:

  • AB: “Higher & intermediate managerial, administrative, professional occupations”.
  • C1: “Supervisory, clerical and junior managerial, administrative, professional occupations”.
  • C2: “Skilled manual occupations”.
  • DE: “Semi-skilled and unskilled manual occupations, unemployed and lowest grade occupations”.

The YouGov survey showed that the majority of people in the poorest social grades (C2 and DE) would blame the public if there was a second coronavirus wave:

YouGov coronavirus survey social grade

All sewn up

This is the result of peak ‘divide and conquer’ from the Tories. We’ve historically seen it with the Brexit vote and its accompanying narrative about immigration; a similar, government and media-pushed agenda surrounding social security claimants being ‘scroungers’ and ‘benefit cheats’; the switching of working-class voters from Labour to the Tories, and the legacy of Margaret Thatcher’s Right to Buy scheme carving up working-class communities.

Now, when a second coronavirus wave hits, the Tories have it sewn up: we’ll all be too busy blaming each other to notice their catastrophic failings. Meanwhile, Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has done little to stop this toxic narrative from sinking in further. And as the ‘new normal’ sets in, it seems that the UK is going to be a more divisive and fractured place than ever before.

Featured image via Chatham House – Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m rarely convinced by ‘survey results’. Is it possible that what constitutes a significant sample response is one that is widely published as a significant sample response. It then becomes an advertising meme that everyone can identify with. It would be good if one could assume that YouGov aren’t part of the Establishment that have been responsible for the mixed messaging that has, in effect, widened the divides among the Ukanian peasantry for over a decade or more, let alone during the current ‘crisis’. Confused messaging must contribute to confused behavioural responses and a group’s seeming inability to act in a coordinated manner suggests an unknown ‘agente provocateur’ at work. It would be sad to think that YouGov is that agent. The repondents cannot be representative of a working class who are adamant that they are not political!

    2. I am not surprised by this survey. Attacks on Corbyn along with people in the “Labour” party, smeared and vilified by the usual suspects, equates to a substantial part of the population actualy believing these lies.The all powerful media, owned by the wealthy extreme right, will win every time. The only chance is alternative platforms such as this, to at least get some perspective on the stories.

    3. The Tories are experts at turning people against each other. They’ve done it for decades with miners, postal workers, teachers, junior doctors. The did it with Brexit, they did it in the last General Election, and now they are doing it with Covid 19 and immigration at Dover.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.