Ladbrokes is a major sponsor in horse racing, and also a partner with the Scottish Premiership and the Rugby Football League Challenge Cup, spending a total of £8m a year. Its threat was greeted with anger from campaigners and social media users.
The “crack cocaine” of gambling
Fixed odds betting terminals, dubbed the “crack cocaine of gambling” by shadow culture secretary Tom Watson, give users automated access to casino games such as blackjack and roulette at up to three times the speed of a live game. The machines allow users to bet as much as £300 a minute, with a £100 limit on each bet. Figures from GambleAware show that 233,000 users lost more than £1,000 in a single sitting in 2016. An estimated 43% of users are at risk of becoming problem gamblers.
A 2015 report (pdf, p3) by the Responsible Gambling Trust found the majority of players of these machines tend to come from economically deprived areas, where the concentration of betting shops is often disproportionately high.
Ladbrokes claimed that the proposed reduction in the stake limit would have implications for the treasury as well as jobs across the UK. Campaigners and opponents were quick to respond, with some comparing the firm to payday lenders.
On Twitter, users described the threats as “pathetic” and “ugly”. Welsh Labour MP Carolyn Harris was one of those who questioned the announcement, with one campaigner describing the threats as ‘scare tactics’:
This statement by Ladbrokes is yet more scare tactics that they and other firms employ to try and dissuade the 2 pound max fobt spin being adopted..Let's remember they got their trading license as a bookmaker not as casino operators the two areas should never be linked together
— Terrymistertonto🏴 (@Terrymisterton2) March 3, 2018
Despite citing job losses, the gambling industry has been concentrating almost solely on internet operations in recent years, gearing adverts towards enticing customers online with free bet offers.
With a decision due in a matter of weeks, Ladbrokes have made strides towards adapting their offline business model. Yesterday it announced plans to turn three former bookmakers shops “into adult gaming centres, also known as arcades”.
Withdrawal of sponsorship
Gambling Watch UK have been calling for betting firms to be restricted from advertising at sporting events for some time. And some people welcomed the proposed withdrawing of sponsorship:
Ladbrokes threads are like the tobacco companies in the 1960s – denying they ruin lives. If they pull out of sports sponsorship it will stop another generation being snared – and others will step in to sponsor #FixedOddsScandal @Ladbrokes https://t.co/4ZiF7WzNKk
— Kevin Pascoe 🖐 (@KevinPascoe) March 3, 2018
The events that now potentially face loss of sponsorship functioned before the advent of the fixed odds betting terminals. And if the gambling industry’s current business model is so reliant on the exploitation of problem gamblers in economically deprived areas, it is surely time for a rethink.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Another Angry Voice, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Kenneth Allen/Wikimedia
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?