Andrew Marr didn’t even mention the disaster that hit Theresa May just before her interview

Marr and May
Support us and go ad-free

Andrew Marr didn’t even mention the disaster that hit Theresa May right before her interview on 15 July. After three resignations earlier in the week, yet another minister resigned from May’s government.

The Mirror effectively forced Andrew Griffiths to resign after the paper revealed that the business minister sent two barmaids £700 while offering sex and demanding explicit images. Now May has had 15 ministerial resignations since the 2017 general election.

Not relevant?

But Marr didn’t ask the prime minister about what happened:

Read on...

There was also no discussion of the latest resignation on Marr’s newspaper review. Griffiths told the Mirror he was “deeply shamed” following the revelations. The media outlet reported that he made “perverted demands” in over 2,000 texts to the barmaids. The married MP for Burton boasted about being politically powerful and asked if a girl could “take a beating” in one message. He also said:

I do not seek to excuse my behaviour and will be seeking professional help to ensure it never happens again.

Talking nonsense

Marr spent most the interview questioning May on her Brexit deal. The prime minister failed to offer any clarity. She denied concerns about her Chequers deal, saying:

That’s wrong, it does allow us to do new trade deals around the rest of the world

Marr also did not mention that the EU parliament has already rejected May’s Brexit white paper. The Brexit Steering Group said it would veto May’s plan unless she came up with a “credible” solution to the Irish border and stopped trying to split up the fundamental freedoms of the single market. These issues suggest that May’s Brexit plan is intrinsically unworkable.

Journalists or damage limitation managers?

The Andrew Marr Show editor Rob Barley responded to concerns about the interview:

But imagine if Jeremy Corbyn was hit by a high-profile resignation right before a major interview. The notion that the BBC wouldn’t ask him about it is absurd.

Adam Bienkov, editor of Business Insider, suggests Marr’s £400,000 salary should make him more incentivised to grill the prime minister. But the Conservative government sets the BBC’s license fee level. So while the government does not set Marr’s remuneration level, the root of his paycheck is Conservative-controlled.

That is one of the structural problems that inhibits the BBC’s political reporting. When David Cameron came to power in 2010, he cut the BBC’s funding. The government can use funding cuts to exert political pressure on the BBC.

Another major issue is that some high-profile positions in the BBC are government appointees. The Conservatives are naturally going to appoint people who conform to their political worldview. Such as the current BBC chairman David Clementi, who was chairman of Virgin Money.

These are the fundamental issues we need to tackle in order to make the BBC into a force for the public, rather than a propaganda network for the establishment. The latest example of such propaganda is Marr not even mentioning May’s fourth ministerial resignation in a week.

We need to democratise the BBC, pronto.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account. Also, read and support other independent media outlets:

Media DiversifiedNovara MediaCorporate WatchRed PepperNew InternationalistCommon SpaceMedia LensBella CaledoniaVox PoliticalEvolve PoliticsReal MediaReel NewsSTRIKE! magazineThe Bristol CableThe Meteor, The SkwawkboxSalford StarThe Ferret.

Featured image via BBC/ Youtube

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed