New evidence of anti-Corbyn sabotage makes the general election result even more extraordinary

Jeremy Corbyn
Support us and go ad-free

Now that we know the extent of the sabotage Jeremy Corbyn faced, the 2017 general election result is all the more extraordinary.

Techno-sabotage

A Labour insider claims the party’s HQ only pretended to carry out some online campaigns for the leadership during the election. These included voter registration drives. Instead, Labour officials paid Facebook to ensure that ads only showed up on the timelines of Corbyn, his advisers, and some journalists sympathetic to their policy platform. The aim was to convince the Labour leadership that they’d carried out its wishes, according to the source.

A new book – Ctrl Alt Delete: How Politics and the Media Crashed Our Democracy – has revealed this deception. It quotes a Labour official who said:

They wanted us to spend a fortune on some schemes like the one they had to encourage voter registration, but we only had to spend about £5,000 to make sure Jeremy’s people, some journalists and bloggers saw it was there on Facebook.

And if it was there for them, they thought it must be there for everyone. It wasn’t. That’s how targeted ads can work.

In response, former Jeremy Corbyn spokesperson Matt Zarb-Cousin said:

Imagine if the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] and party staffers just got on with their jobs, we might actually be in government now.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Labour HQ diverted funding

There were three separate Labour campaigns during the general election: the grassroots one via Momentum, the leadership’s (out of Corbyn’s office), and the Labour bureaucracy’s. It appears the latter may have cost Labour the general election.

The problem went beyond individual acts of sabotage. Labour officials also diverted core funding during the election to the detriment of the party. The bureaucracy took a defensive attitude that potentially cost key seats, as Jacobin reported:

Fabian Hamilton, who already had a majority over seven thousand received not one but two organizers, while the next door marginal of Pudsey had none. The result is that Hamilton’s majority is now a staggering seventeen thousand, to no benefit of the wider aim of a Labour government, while the Labour Party lost Pudsey by 331 votes.

This was replicated elsewhere, leaving “safe seats spectacularly over-resourced”, and reducing some marginal campaigns to “swiping materials” because they “couldn’t afford posters”.

“Co-operative party machine”

Corbyn’s electoral performance has enabled the ongoing reform of party structures. It’s also secured a general secretary who supports the leadership. Responding to the revelations of digital sabotage, a Labour source told the Sunday Times:

Despite fighting with one hand tied behind our backs by some uncooperative senior staff, we achieved the largest increase in the Labour vote since 1945. At the next election, we’ll have a fantastic and co-operative party machine to match our incredible mass membership and popular policies.

In 2017, Momentum and the leadership fought an election completely out of sync with Labour’s bureaucracy. On top of that, it appears party officials were deceiving the leadership to effectively undermine the campaign.

Despite that, Corbyn’s platform still brought a progressive government closer to victory than at any point in recent history. With Labour increasingly in better internal shape, it’s no wonder the Conservatives are terrified of a general election.

Get Involved!

– If you are a Labour member, you can sign the letter calling for an investigation into the digital sabotage.

Featured image via Sophie Brown/ WikiCommons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed