While all eyes were on Chequers, a TIG MP travelled 3,000 miles to smear Jeremy Corbyn

Joan Ryan speaking at the AIPAC conference
Tracy Keeling

While the Brexit chaos continued at Chequers on 24 March, an Independent Group (TIG) MP travelled over 3,000 miles to smear Jeremy Corbyn.

Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) chair Joan Ryan spoke at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) 2019 conference in Washington, DC. During her contribution, she repeated a weak and debunked smear about the Labour leader to the 18,000-strong audience. She was also very candid about the issue she has with Labour’s current direction.

Speaking to the choir

AIPAC is a powerful pro-Israel lobby group in the US. This year, a number of progressive politicians decided not to attend its conference. Bernie Sanders’ policy director Josh Orton said he wouldn’t attend because it platforms “leaders who have expressed bigotry and oppose a two-state solution”.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




Ryan, however, said she was “proud” to attend as a “Zionist” who’s a “staunch supporter of the world’s only Jewish state”. But the MP tried to paint a dire picture of the party she’s just left to the adoring crowd. She said:

Over the past four years, Britain’s Labour Party… has been transformed.

Labour, Ryan asserted, has been “taken over by the far left” and is “riddled with antisemitism”. She claimed it’s no longer a “close friend of Israel”, but “now seeks to demonise and delegitimise” the state. Ryan also claimed the party is now led by someone who:

proudly declares Hamas and Hezbollah to be his friends.

A tabloid smear

Corbyn has tackled and debunked this smear against him on a number of occasions. As Corbyn has explained, he used the word ‘friends’ to describe Hamas and Hezbollah during a meeting in parliament. This was “inclusive language“, chosen to encourage dialogue about the peace process.

In a fiery 2015 interview on Channel 4 News, Corbyn also said the media’s obsession with the word “friends” was an attempt to “trivialise” the issue of how peace can be achieved in the Middle East. He accused Krishnan Guru-Murthy of doing “tabloid journalism”.

In short, this supposed mark against Corbyn’s name is a non-starter; because it’s a non-story. But that didn’t stop Ryan spreading it at the AIPAC conference.

Unsurprisingly, the MP didn’t contextualise the Labour leader’s use of the word ‘friends’ either. She didn’t explain that he used it out of a desire to advance the peace process in the Middle East. In fact, she didn’t mention the peace process at all.

No, all Ryan did at the conference (aside from repeating a baseless smear against Corbyn) was effectively affirm her dedication to the status quo on the Palestine/Israel conflict. She blurred the lines between antisemitism and opposition to Israel’s actions by speaking about them in the same breath. And she attacked her former party.

Maintaining conflict

Antisemitism is wrong. Israel’s occupation of Palestine is wrong. A legitimate peace process is vital to securing Palestine and Israel’s security. Corbyn is right: all relevant parties need to be involved in bringing peace to the region. All these things can be true at the same time. Indeed, acknowledging that they are all true is necessary in moving towards peace for both Jews and Arabs in the region.

Ryan, however, is clearly not a politician willing to address that at all. Labour is better off without her.

Featured image via AIPAC

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Given the lack of any verifiable evidence to back claims of Labour having antisemitic members beyond the level of any other party, isn’t it time for Corbyn, or the party itself to sue?

    2. There will be no peace in the middle east while the world in general and the west in particular continue to turn a blind eye to the illegal land grab of ancient Palestinian properties and land by the FEW religious extremists that hold the Israeli and Western governments to ransom.
      There, I have said it, no doubt I, too, am an Anti-semite.

      1. Those who attempt to portray Corbyn as a supporter of Islamic fundamentalism are desperate. The only conclusion to be drawn from people who consistently oppose Corbyn’s attempts to initiate dialogue between Israel and Palestine is that they’re rabid racists; they never, ever, refer to the plight of the Palestinian people, but do everything to bury the issue by insinuating that any dialogue or diplomatic language with one particular side in this conflict – Palestine – is unacceptable. The reason is racism. If people like you were not racists, you’d find one word of sympathy for the underdog In this fight; you don’t, because you’re an Islamophobic racist, and your racism consists in smearing any attempt to give Palestinian people a voice. And please, if speaking up for Palestinians is anti semitism, then, on those grounds, and on those grounds alone, I’m an anti semite, but if doing everything in your power to suppress the right of the Palestinian people to self determination is also anti semitism, then so are you, on grounds that are utterly shameful.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.