After Jeremy Corbyn led the opposition parties in legislating an extension to prevent no-deal, Sajid Javid looks trapped. In fact, the Chancellor’s 8 September interview on the Andrew Marr Show descended into a surreal slow motion car crash.
An opposition bill designed to prevent a no-deal Brexit is close to becoming law. The bill would effectively force Boris Johnson to ask for an extension should he not pass a withdrawal agreement before 19 October. The extension would be until 31 January 2019.
The incoming legislation appears to force Johnson and his government into a corner. On the BBC, Marr asked Javid:
If the law says that he must ask for an extension, what are his options?
The law talks about October 19th in case there is no deal agreed… should we get to that position… of course we will obey the law, but we will look at our options
Marr sought to clarify:
So on October 19th, after that council, the prime minister would ask for an extension because that is the law of this country.
But then Javid contradicted himself, as he had asserted the opposite:
No. We will not change our policy
And Marr called out the clear contradiction:
The government’s position is that ‘we will obey the law, but we won’t do what the law tells us to do’… Explain what’s wrong about what I’ve just said
Sample of that @sajidjavid car crash interview.
Isn’t “the prime minister will absolutely not be requesting an extension AT THAT MEETING” (my emphasis) an interesting thing to repeat twice verbatim? pic.twitter.com/rbkfrAENR7
— Alex Andreou (@sturdyAlex) September 8, 2019
On the show, the Chancellor could then only retreat into contradictory mental gymnastics:
the prime minister will go to the council meeting on the 17th and 18th. He’ll be trying to strike a deal. He absolutely will not be asking for an extension in that meeting… The bill talks about the 19th being an important date. And at that point we will consider our potions. But our policy is clear, it is unchanged, we will be leaving on October 31st.
Another issue with Johnson and Javid’s position is that the government cannot negotiate a new Brexit deal.The hard border between Britain and the UK has to be either within Ireland or in the Irish sea. The first option is unacceptable for Ireland itself, which has a veto on any deal. The second is unacceptable for the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), which the Conservatives rely on to govern. So there is no solution to avoiding a hard border other than a ‘soft Brexit’ permanent customs union combined with a level of single market regulatory alignment. And Johnson’s hard-Brexit base won’t accept such a close relationship between the UK and the EU.
“Tin pot dictator”
Meanwhile, on Sky’s Ridge on Sunday, Labour’s legal spokesperson Shami Chakrabarti spoke out against the possibility that the government will break the law:
I think it’s extraordinary… The idea that a sitting prime minister in one of the oldest democracies on the planet would say, ‘I will ignore the law’… I think the position is irresponsible and elitist. The idea there’s one law for Boris Johnson and his mates and another law for everyone else
'Every tinpot dictator throughout history has used the excuse of having the people of their side to break the law'
Labour's Baroness Chakrabarti says PM @BorisJohnson's actions in recent weeks are "un-British" and "anti-democratic".
— Ridge on Sunday (@RidgeOnSunday) September 8, 2019
Ridge asked the shadow attorney general:
what they would say is that they are trying to enact the will of the people, that they’re trying to do what parliament is trying to block, which is to carry out the result of the referendum.
And Chakrabarti said:
I’ve heard what they said… but every tin pot dictator on the planet throughout history has used the excuse of having the people on their side to break the law, to shut down parliament… It’s absolutely extraordinary.
On Marr, Javid was trapped in a corner. The government cannot deliver an alternative Brexit deal because it has no solution to the Irish border. At the same time, it looks like it cannot deliver no-deal because the opposition bill prevents it. That left nothing short of a slow motion car crash.
Featured image via BBC Iplayer
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?