As if it was possible, Labour’s £54bn pledge for WASPI women makes Johnson look even worse

Split image: protest for Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) / Jeremy Corbyn holding the Labour manifesto
Support us and go ad-free

In a hugely significant development, Labour has pledged a solid £58bn to compensate so-called WASPI women (Women Against State Pension Inequality). They face huge pension losses as a result of Tories increasing the retirement age to 66. This change affected an estimated four million women. Labour’s latest announcement is therefore predicted to have a considerable impact on the outcome of this election.

How did we get here?

During the Leaders Special broadcast on the BBC on 22 November, an audience member asked Boris Johnson if he’ll help those women affected. Johnson squarely evaded the question and said:

I cannot promise that I can magic up that money for you.

Given the amount of money this government has ‘magicked up’ for a host of other issues – such as £6bn for Brexit planning – Johnson’s claim is disingenuous at best. But more so, he and his government keep failing to take responsibility for the problems their policies have created.

And his refusal to help WASPI women may play a vital role in this election. As Joanne Welch, founder of Backto60 told the Independent:

There are almost 6,000 women born in the 1950’s in each constituency across the country on average. If the incumbent MP’s majority is slim, then they can easily sway the result of that constituency.

Stolen pensions

The Conservatives’ disdain for ordinary people is becoming increasingly clear in this election. Whether through Johnson’s refusal to help WASPI women or the home secretary’s dismissal of the government’s role in creating poverty.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Speaking on The Andrew Marr Show on the BBC on 24 November, Labour’s Angela Rayner highlighted how this government has effectively ‘stolen’ these women’s pensions. Rayner said:

The Conservatives with the Liberal Democrats stole this money from those women who were born in the 1950s. It’s completely unacceptable. And millions of women have been plunged into poverty, and don’t just want handouts by social security, they want their money back, and quite rightly so. They should be feeling angry about what the government did. And we will right that injustice because justice is a price worth paying.

Labour’s pledge is vital

The retirement age increase is yet another example of how working-class and vulnerable people don’t feature in the Conservatives’ priorities. Changes proposed in 2011 were supposedly a measure to reduce the government’s budget deficit. However, the media and campaigners have refused to be silenced on this issue. Because these changes disproportionately affect millions of women born in the 1950s.

When Labour’s manifesto was launched, there were initially some concerns that commitments to WASPI women were not specific enough. But this latest announcement doesn’t just address these criticisms, it goes further. And it does so in a way that puts Johnson and the Conservatives to shame.

WASPI women can rest assured that they have a specific, meaningful pledge from Labour if the party comes to power in this general election.

Featured image YouTube – Citywire/Guardian News

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Did anyone think of asking where they are going to get this 58 billion from? At least Johnson was honest as he knew the money just isn’t there and can’t be spent on just any one thing. This is an awful lot of money we’re talking about. A case of rob Peter to pay Paul? Who is going to bear the brunt of this? Labour have left the country in dire straits before. They spend and spend until there is nothing left. Then the next government have to look like the bad guy and make cut backs to get everything back on its feet again. Wake up people! Don’t you see? Anyone who votes Labour are out of their minds!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.