Priti Patel has taken to Twitter to lie about the London Bridge attacker. In fact, the lies contained in her tweet are so obvious, that people – from journalists to lawyers – are literally begging her to stop. What’s even more embarrassing is that as Conservative home secretary, Patel should know more about law and order than she clearly does.
But while Patel and other leading Tories keep lying, Jeremy Corbyn is offering hope for the future. Because Corbyn recognises the circumstances that created a breeding ground for terrorism are complex. And a Labour government with a radically different foreign policy could stop future attacks occurring.
It’s all Labour’s fault
While people are reeling from the terrorist attack, the father of Jack Merritt, one of those killed, made the following plea:
My son, Jack, who was killed in this attack, would not wish his death to be used as the pretext for more draconian sentences or for detaining people unnecessarily.
Something which most Conservative politicians are wilfully ignoring. But even worse, Tory MPs are actively lying about where the blame lies for the attacks.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
Because legislation brought in by your government in 2008 meant that dangerous terrorists had to automatically be released after half of their jail term. Conservatives changed the law in 2012 to end your automatic release policy but Khan was convicted before this. https://t.co/8fCm880MSK
— Priti Patel (@patel4witham) November 30, 2019
Usman Khan, the London attacker who was shot by police, was sentenced to an indeterminate public protection sentence (IPP) sentence in 2012. But IPPs were abolished and the Court of Appeal fixed the sentence to 16 years in 2013. Khan served half of this sentence before being released. All this happened under Conservative-led governments.
Furthermore, under the Tories, probation services have been drastically cut and partially privatised. One probation worker wrote the following during the discussion over the release of rapist John Worboys – another IPP prisoner.
Probation officers used to be able to take the time to understand the individual and be responsive to their needs. But in 2014, the probation service split in two, and the work has been draining and mentally exhausting ever since. Now, the NPS only works with the most dangerous offenders – those deemed high risk – the rest are supervised by private community rehabilitation companies (CRCs).
They further stated:
Today the job is about fire-fighting, to get assessments done and targets hit. We just have to hope that nothing goes wrong.
On Twitter, a retired lawyer set the record straight:
This defendant committed the offence when David Cameron was Prime Minister/Theresa May Home Sec from May 2010
Khan was Arrested 20th Dec 2012.
He was sentenced in February 2012
The appeal was heard on 16 April 2012
All when Cameron was Prime Minister and May was Home Sec
— Fionna O'Leary, 🕷 #FBPE (@fascinatorfun) November 30, 2019
The Secret Barrister has forensically taken the case apart and pointed out the following in relation to Boris Johnson’s lies:
— Sarah Rosemary (@SarahRosemary3) November 30, 2019
Please, please, just stop
The Secret Barrister also asked Patel to “stop lying”:
This is a lie. Many types of sentence have long been available to courts to ensure that a dangerous offender was not automatically released. Stop lying.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) November 30, 2019
And they weren’t the only person begging Patel to stop. As Aaron Bastani from Novara Media tweeted:
please stop lying literally all of the time https://t.co/F3nqa7G568
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) December 1, 2019
So far, this election campaign has been populated by lies from Conservative politicians. Whether it’s claims over the number of hospitals promised, the number of nurses or lies about Labour’s tax plans, the Tories can’t seem to help themselves.
And even if Patel is given the benefit of the doubt and her lying wasn’t deliberate, she hasn’t deleted the tweet or apologised for getting it wrong. So if she really believes what she’s saying, she’s displaying a woeful ignorance for someone who’s supposed to be in charge of our criminal justice system.
A different approach is needed
Moreover, even in some bizarre alternative universe where Patel is right about why Khan was released, there are still fundamental questions about prisons and sentencing that need addressing. Especially given there are still 2,223 people languishing in prison on IPPs that have destroyed lives.
Locking people up doesn’t solve the problem. As Jeremy Corbyn stated, the “war on terror has manifestly failed”. He continued:
Sixteen years ago, I warned against the invasion and occupation of Iraq. I said it would set off a spiral of conflict, hate, misery and desperation that will fuel the wars, the conflict, the terrorism and the misery of future generations. It did, and we are still living with the consequences today.
The war on terror has manifestly failed. Britain’s repeated military interventions in North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia have exacerbated, rather than resolved the problems.
And this is why a different approach is needed. Whether it’s Johnson and Patel, or Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, decades of successive governments have pursued foreign policies based on profit – whether that be from oil or arms sales – over a safe future. If we want to stop further terrorist attacks, locking people up for longer isn’t the answer. And a Corbyn government and a radically overhauled foreign policy is the best opportunity we have of making the world a safer place and stopping the next generation of potential terrorists.Support us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.