The DWP is under the microscope. Here’s how to have your say.

The DWP logo and storm clouds

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is the subject of an official government probe. The body in charge of it wants sick and disabled claimants to submit evidence about how the DWP interacts with them. And the timing couldn’t be better, because it comes as the government prepares its “National Disability Strategy”.

The DWP: under the microscope

The Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC) is a government body. Its role is to review what the DWP does and give it advice. Previously the SSAC looked into Universal Credit. But now, it’s probing how the DWP operates more broadly.

To be clear: the SSAC research is about how the DWP interacts with disabled people. It is not about benefits. The SSAC says it is:

conducting research into how the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) engage with disabled people in formulating policies and processes which affect them.

It notes that:

DWP regularly consults disabled people, or organisations representing them, in developing policies and implementing services affecting them. However, the extent, consistency and effectiveness of that engagement is not clear.

So, the SSAC’s:

Read on...

research aims to build a better understanding of that, and consider what scope exists to improve DWP’s current approach, drawing on relevant best practice that exists elsewhere.

What the SSAC wants

It wants to hear from people about what it’s like to give feedback to the DWP. While the SSAC wants disabled people’s organisations (DPOs) to give evidence, it also wants to hear from individuals.

This may not apply to everyone. But it would be worthwhile for people to get involved who have:

  • Made a complaint to the DWP.
  • Completed a claimants survey.
  • Been part of DWP research.
  • Had any other engagement with the DWP, when it’s asked for their opinions.

Also, sick and disabled people who have not had any interactions with the DWP about how it operates, but feel their opinions should be heard, should also consider contacting the SSAC.

The way the DWP interacts with sick and disabled people is problematic. This was highlighted in a report by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. For example, it noted how the DWP and government did not involve sick and disabled people’s groups in the monitoring of how the UN convention for disabled people was implemented across the country. Also, many of the UN’s recommendations advised the government to involve sick and disabled people more.

The timing of this review is apt. Because the government is supposed to be releasing a National Disability Strategy this year.

A national strategy?

As the Queen’s speech in December 2019 noted, the government said:

We want to transform the lives of disabled people, ensuring they have access to opportunities and are able to achieve their potential. We will publish a National Strategy for Disabled People in 2020 to ensure disabled people can lead a life of opportunity and fulfilment. Our strategy will be ambitious, supporting disabled people in all aspects and phases of their life.

The strategy will set out practical proposals on the issues that matter most to disabled people and we will use all the levers of Government to support disabled people to achieve their potential.

The strategy, to be developed with disabled people, disability organisations and charities, will include housing, education & transport.

But so far, the government has not published any more details. So, no one knows who the government and DWP are consulting about this. That is, if they’re consulting anyone at all.

Get involved. Now.

So the more feedback the SSAC gets, the better. Because if the DWP and the government are publishing a strategy, but not involving sick and disabled people, it will just be more lip service. The SSAC’s remit will at least give people a platform to try and affect positive change in the department. Anyone who has experience with the DWP knows it often feels like it doesn’t listen. As a minimum, at least with the SSAC review, someone will.

Featured image via cjohnson – Wikimedia and Wikimedia 

Get involved

  • Take part in the SSAC consultation here.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us