Despite the risk of a coronavirus (Covid-19) cancellation, devolved elections in Scotland are scheduled for 6 May 2021. The newly formed Action for Independence (AFI) has labelled it “the independence election”. And opinion polls appear to show support for Scottish independence is growing.
On 15 November, born out of frustration with Johnson’s handling of Brexit and coronavirus, Scottish National Party (SNP) Westminster leader Ian Blackford MP announced a second independence referendum will take place next year. So talk of Scottish independence was already high on the agenda.
But then Boris Johnson entered the fray to inadvertently give the pro-independence movement an extra bit of support. Because on a Zoom call to northern English Conservative MPs he reportedly said Scottish devolution had been a “disaster” and a “mistake”.
Response to Johnson’s ‘disastrous’ comments
Spokesperson for AFI Derek Macpherson told The Canary:
With this comment Johnson has once again shown his complete and utter contempt for democracy, and for the Scottish people, who voted overwhelmingly for devolution in 1997. His every utterance only helps ensure we will deliver a similarly strong verdict when next we vote on independence.
Boris Johnson has been a [disaster] for the Union
Communities secretary Robert Jenrick attempted to explain Johnson’s comments by saying:
the prime minister’s always supported devolution but he is at heart a unionist and he is very troubled by the rise of nationalism and separatism in the form of Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP
It’s called “democracy,” @RobertJenrick . If the people of Scotland continue to overwhelmingly elect a party of government that holds Scottish independence as its core driving principle, then you should not be surprised when that party pushes to deliver on its democratic mandate.
Former Scottish press chief, Andy Maciver said Johnson’s comments now meant the “Union is dead”. Maciver said it showed Johnson and Tory MPs don’t know “what’s going on” in Scotland.
Action for Independence
Tommy Sheridan’s Solidarity Party has already agreed to join AFI to fight next year’s election. This would “Max the Yes” vote, according to Solidarity, and make a second Scottish independence referendum in 2021 “inevitable”.
to give YES, Indy groups and individuals a voice in Scotland’s parliament and to remove as many non indy msp’s as possible.
And it believes:
the best way to make our collective voice heard is to work together to make it happen.
Macpherson told The Canary that it was founded in February 2020 and hopes to soon be formally recognised as a political party.
SNP in government
And it’s because of the SNP’s regional list vote performance at the 2016 elections that AFI believes pro-independence groups need a different strategy for 2021.
Scottish election system
Voters in Scotland have two votes. With their first vote, they elect one MSP from each of the 73 constituencies. These 73 MSPs are elected on a ‘first past the post’ basis, where voters put an X beside their preferred candidate. This is just like the voting system used in Westminster elections. Then with their second vote, they elect the 56 additional MSPs through the ‘additional member system’ (AMS).
For AMS, Scotland is also divided into eight parliamentary regions. Each region elects seven MSPs. These 56 regional MSPs are also called ‘list MSPs’. On the AMS, Scottish voters choose a political party, as opposed to their preferred candidate. They could also choose an independent candidate. These MSPs are then selected from lists compiled in advance by the parties.
But these list MSPs are not selected using the ‘first past the post’ system. They are selected using the D’Hondt formula. This formula selects list MSPs by adding up the total votes their party gets in the regional ballot and then divides that number by the number of MSPs that party has already won in that region, plus one.
Macpherson told The Canary that while:
you could have a majority on the constituency seats alone but the way the additional member system works… the better you do on the constituency section the harder it is to get any seats on the list
In 2016, the SNP only got four list MSPs out of a possible 56 on the AMS. And this was despite getting 953,587 list votes and almost 42% of the vote. Despite getting almost half of that vote, the Scottish Conservatives won 24 list MSPs. So anti-independence parties won an advantage. This is what AFI want to change.
How could AFI change this?
The outlook is currently favourable for pro-independence parties. But while the SNP could increase its constituency MSPs in 2021, it could also lose list MSPs. And while the predicted numbers still look good for the SNP, it could be a different scenario next May. And that’s the situation AFI wants to avoid.
Macpherson said AFI wants to avoid a scenario whereby pro-independence do so well in the ‘first past the post’ system that they hand an advantage to unionist parties on AMS. Despite that advantage, unionist parties would still not form a government. But, according to Macpherson, opposition:
gives them almost an equal status … a sort of false equivalence.
So, Macpherson believes AFI can be effective in furthering Scottish independence by only standing for the list positions. By doing so, and in winning the 24 seats its interim leader Dave Thompson believes it can win, AFI could become “the second largest grouping after the SNP.” This would make it “the official opposition” and help “push unionism further away from the mainstream”.
Therefore, with both opposition and government favouring independence, Macpherson believes this majority would “push for progress for second referendum” on Scottish independence.
Can it work?
Whether AFI can get more parties to support its call for tactical voting remains to be seen. But with more outbursts like this from an increasingly unsettled Johnson, it may just get that support.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?