Met police officer jailed for attacking a Black man who was visiting his partner’s grave

Metropolitan police officers at Black Lives Matter London protest, 6 June 2020
Support us and go ad-free

Charlie Harrison, a Metropolitan police officer, has been jailed for breaking a Black man’s knee in a ‘clear case of racial profiling’. Harrison fractured Carl Abrahams’ knee while Abrahams was visiting his partner’s grave with his children. Southwark crown court found Harrison guilty of causing grievous bodily harm. He has been jailed for two years and three months.

The incident

On 31 December 2018, Abrahams – a 47-year-old Black man – was visiting his partner’s grave in east London “with his two teenage sons”. Harrison – part of the Metropolitan police’s violent crime taskforce – approached the family after getting out of an unmarked police car. The plainclothes officer failed to identify himself. Without warning, Harrison kicked Abrahams’ knee, fracturing it and knocking him to the ground.

According to the Guardian, a passerby protested against the officer’s conduct. At this point, Harrison’s colleagues “rushed out their cars” and threatened to arrest the passerby.

Abrahams reported the incident to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) in January 2019. He sought hospital treatment and was left on crutches for 12 weeks. He told the court that his children are still afraid of police and “fear they will be targeted because of the colour of their skin”. The Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) launched an investigation in 2019.

A ‘clear case of racial profiling’

On 12 April, the court sentenced Harison to two years and three months in prison. In an interview, Harrison claimed that he stopped Abrahams to look for “drugs and weapons”. But during his trial, he claimed to have found it suspicious that Abrahams and his sons “noticed” his car.

Judge Gregory Perrins said:

Having heard the evidence at trial, I strongly suspect that the reason that you stopped Mr Abrahams and his sons was because they were black.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

He added:

Had Mr Abrahams and his sons been white I suspect that you would have simply drove on by; this was in my judgment a clear case of racial profiling.

The judge found that Harrison had “no grounds” to carry out a stop and search, or to arrest Abrahams and his sons. During the trial, Harrison suggested that Abrahams’ sons were being “aggressive and confrontational”. But the judge stated that “the video footage shows the exact opposite”.

Perrins concluded:

Having heard the evidence at trial I see no basis upon which you could genuinely have thought it necessary to defend yourself from a man walking down the street with his two sons with his hands in his pockets.

This was a deliberate assault.

The officer is now facing a “fast-track discipline process”. The Met will “consider whether race played a part in Harrison’s actions”.

Not a case of one ‘bad apple’

Commander Paul Betts said:

This matter was subject to a thorough investigation by the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards and PC Harrison charged and later convicted by a jury.

He added:

His actions were found to have fallen well below the standard we expect of our police officers, with a man left badly injured. This type of behaviour has no place in our police service and undermines the confidence of the communities we are here to protect.

However, this incident of racial profiling and assault is not just a case of one ‘bad apple’. It’s the product of institutional racism in the Metropolitan police. Harrison’s taskforce were told to search for Black males suspected of violent crimes. And although Harrison has been imprisoned for grievous bodily harm, he has not yet been dismissed from the Met police.

More broadly, a UCL study found that “young Black males in London were 19 times more likely to be stopped and searched than the general population”. And according to the government’s ethnicity facts and figures:

the Metropolitan Police made 80% of all searches of Black people in the year ending March 2020.

22 years on from the MacPherson report, Black Londoners are still bearing the brunt of an institutionally racist police force.

Featured image via James Eades/Unsplash.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m more than curious as to exactly why this has taken 6/7 years to come to court.. Had this action have been the other way round, the aggressor would have been up in court within a matter of weeks or months…

    2. What is a police force for? To grant to a section of the population the right to arrest and use force against the rest is certain to lead to abuse. The community must police itself. Of course, people’s eyes glaze over at the suggestion, but self-policing communities have been the norm through pre-history and a fair spread of history. A large proportion of crime is against property: what a surprise in a culture organised around the pursuit of lucre. The best way to reduce crime is to eliminate inequality and to put the pursuit of good relations above the lust for lucre. Of course, the poor are always suspect in a society dominated by wealth; but to be poor and black (they often go hand in hand, naturally, because of prejudice) is highly suspect. In 1878 Lord Salisbury remarked: “If our ancestors had cared for the rights of other people, the British Empire would not have been made” and in 1889 “I doubt if we have got to the point where a British constituency will elect a black man to represent them.” There you have it. That is the tradition our modernity was born from. Racism in pursuit of lucre is how Britain got rich and the unacknowledged sense that Brits have the right to exploit “lesser” people still bubbles in the mass mind. Hence when those vested with the power to protect property see “lesser” people, the circuit is completed an an innocent man gets his knee smashed and his kids terrified. Only a society of equality can rid us of this.

    3. What else what would you expect from the force that gave you Orgreave? “Come and wet this mounted police baton, you dirty striking Thatcher-hating miner, you!”
      “Er, PC Dimbleby, Orgreave was 36 years ago, you’re on crowd control duty at the Chelsea Flower Show today!”

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.