Revelations of CIA conspiring to murder Julian Assange jeopardise US prosecution case

Julian Assange
Support us and go ad-free

The US prosecution of Julian Assange has been dealt another blow following revelations that the CIA plotted the kidnap and rendition or murder of the WikiLeaks founder. The revelations also directly implicate Mike Pompeo, former CIA director and secretary of state, and US president Donald Trump.

Separately, there’s evidence of how cyber activists foiled a 2012 attempt by British police to break into and enter the Ecuadorian embassy where Assange had sought asylum.

Permission to act

In April 2017, Pompeo publicly declared that “WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service”. Arguably, that could be interpreted as an invitation to the CIA and other US agencies to take action against Assange and other WikiLeaks staffers.

The Intercept subsequently reported that the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 stated:

It is the sense of Congress that WikiLeaks and the senior leadership of WikiLeaks resemble a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such a service by the United States.

The plot

Plans to kill or kidnap Assange were discussed when Assange was still in refuge at the Ecuadorian embassy. Worried about an alleged scheme that could see Assange escape the UK for Russia, the CIA and the White House considered a number of scenarios, including:

potential gun battles with Kremlin operatives on the streets of London, crashing a car into a Russian diplomatic vehicle transporting Assange and then grabbing him, and shooting out the tires of a Russian plane carrying Assange before it could take off for Moscow. (U.S. officials asked their British counterparts to do the shooting if gunfire was required, and the British agreed, according to a former senior administration official.)

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Reportedly, a former senior Trump official claimed that US, UK, and Russian undercover intelligence operatives had been stationed in the streets near the embassy.

And in May 2018, WikiLeaks claimed a “grab team” had been spotted near the embassy:

However, Assange rejected all suggestions he planned to escape the UK for Russia.

It’s also claimed by Yahoo! News that then US president Donald Trump asked whether the CIA could assassinate the WikiLeaks founder, though Trump denies this.

Pompeo is now calling for the prosecution of those officials who talked with Yahoo! News regarding plans for Assange’s kidnapping or murder:

The UK’s complicity

Nor can UK authorities profess innocence to breaking the law in order to seize Assange. On the evening of 15 August 2012, around 20 British police officers attempted to extricate Assange from the Ecuadorian embassy’s protection. However, thanks to some eagle-eyed “cyber warriors”, that attempt was spectacularly foiled.

Darker Net published a timeline showing that police were spotted climbing a fire escape, then trying to enter the embassy from an upper floor fire door. One cyber observer immediately contacted Jennifer Robinson from Assange’s legal team, to ask that she contact senior Assange lawyer Gareth Peirce.

Some three hours later Robinson tweeted:

Meanwhile, hacker group AntiLeaks succeeded in blocking live video footage of the raid, but only temporarily. AntiLeaks had previously been conducting cyber attacks on WikiLeaks.

Had the raid not been exposed and subsequently thwarted, British authorities would have been guilty of contravening diplomatic immunity conventions.

The next day, WikiLeaks issued a statement:

Any transgression against the sanctity of the embassy is a unilateral and shameful act, and a violation of the Vienna Convention, which protects embassies worldwide.

Also that day, on hearing of the aborted raid, the Organisation of American States passed a motion in support of Ecuador.

Craig Murray, former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, later explained how some hours before the raid took place a “very senior official within the Foreign and Commonwealth Office” contacted him and said:

there was tremendous discomfort at this development within the British diplomatic service because of the potential exposure of British embassies and diplomats abroad to similar action. I asked how on earth such an illegal decision could have been reached. My ex-colleague said that political pressure exerted by the administration of the United States of America on Mr William Hague and Mr David Cameron had outweighed the views of British diplomats. [Emphasis by Murray]

Indeed, had the police gained full entry to the embassy, without permission from Ecuadorian authorities, that would arguably have placed every UK embassy around the world in danger of similar violation.

(Note: this author played a key role in exposing the police’s attempted illegal entry into the embassy.)


Following the more recent revelations by Yahoo! News, Assange’s US lawyer Barry Pollack commented:

My hope and expectation is that the UK courts will consider this information [regarding plans to kidnap and murder] and it will further bolster its decision not to extradite to the US.

Documentary film maker Laura Poitras commented that “the CIA… conspired to seek the rendition and extrajudicial assassination of Julian Assange”. She described this as a “state-sponsored crime against the press”.

Moreover, celebrated whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers, has called on US president Joe Biden to drop all charges against Assange:

Politically motivated

Meanwhile, Assange is still held in Belmarsh Prison, even though UK tribunal judge Vanessa Baraitser blocked his extradition to the US on health and safety grounds – meaning risk of suicide. But her ruling regarding the charges raised equated to a “ringing endorsement of the US prosecution case”.

The latest revelations provide further proof that the US case against Assange is political, and therefore the prosecution should cease.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us