“I’m f*cking furious” – leading scientist damns the government’s coronavirus strategy

An explosion and coronavirus Covid-19
Support us and go ad-free

The UK government is putting thousands of lives at risk by continuing to apply its unofficial coronavirus (Covid-19) herd immunity policy. Clearly, it has not learned any lessons from earlier stages of the pandemic.

Meanwhile, clinicians and scientists are demanding the government cease its dithering and act now to mitigate against the likelihood of many more deaths.

Pandemic restrictions in schools nonsensical

Back in July, Queen Mary University of London senior lecturer Deepti Gurdasani tweeted how government policy was all about exposing the young to coronavirus and chronic illnesses:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Since 17 May mask wearing is not mandatory in classrooms or communal areas in schools in England. Nor are staff required to wear masks in classrooms. However that’s not the case everywhere. In Scotland, for example, masks remain compulsory in secondary schools for students and staff, though not for primary school children.

None of this makes sense. In a 23 tweet thread by Independent SAGE member Christina Pagel it is explained why:

Pagel also quotes from a recommendation over the summer by the US Center for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) that there should be “universal indoor masking for all teacher, staff, students, and visitors” in all schools for Kindergarten to Year 12.

In an August article in the British Medical Journal – on top of vaccinations for all 12-17 year olds – Pagel recommended:

social distancing (e.g. smaller class sizes, staggered breaks); ventilation (e.g. CO2 monitors, HEPA filters, window policies, outdoor learning); cleaning surfaces; mask wearing; keeping children within bubbles of regular contacts; frequent testing; and isolation of contacts of cases.

“Furious”

Pagel also provides statistical evidence that “hospitalisations in 6-17 year olds are rising steeply”. Indeed, Office of National Statistics (ONS) figures for week ending 16 October show that “The percentage of people [across all age groups] testing positive for COVID-19 remained highest for those in school Years 7 to 11, at 7.80%”.

Pagel concludes her thread:

I’m fucking furious. And no, I’m not sorry for swearing.

But the bad news doesn’t end there. According to John Hopkins university, coronavirus cases per million for the UK up to 13 October were way higher than, for example, Germany, Italy, France, Portugal, and Spain:

“Wilfully negligent”

In July in a letter to the Lancet 1,200 scientists and clinicians described the UK government’s coronavirus strategy as nothing less than “herd immunity by mass infection”. In other words, the toleration of needless deaths. And in September The Canary reported that some clinicians accused the government of being “reckless” for allowing the “mass infection” of children.

Former chief scientific adviser and Independent SAGE chair David King condemned the ‘herd immunity’ approach:

It is unbelievable that the UK government should embark on a herd immunity strategy that will see thousands of unnecessary deaths and severe long-term illness when so much progress has been made with the vaccination programme.

Danny Altmann, professor of immunology at Imperial College London, says that currently the phrase ‘learn to live with Covid’ is being used to avoid “simple mitigations”.

Meanwhile, British Medical Association chair Chaand Nagpaul has accused the government of negligence:

It is wilfully negligent of the Westminster government not to be taking any further action to reduce the spread of infection, such as mandatory mask wearing, physical distancing and ventilation requirements in high-risk settings, particularly indoor crowded spaces.

He added:

We are rapidly approaching a position where, yet again, the government is delaying for too long, and equivocating over taking action. This is the time to learn the lessons of the past and act fast, or else we will face far more extreme measures later.

Demand for Plan B+

In September, Independent SAGE issued a 9 point plan to deal with the pandemic over the coming months. The official SAGE also recommended more homeworking and use of masks. Meanwhile, coronavirus cases have recently been recorded as more than 50,000, with the highest rates affecting 10 to 19 year olds. The British Medical Association (BMA) reported that thousands of doctors demanded that social distancing and face masks remain mandatory.

Doctors are now calling for Plan B to be implemented in England, which would at least see mandatory face masks in some settings, vaccine passports, and more homeworking.

The NHS Confederation commented:

NHS Confederation CEO Matthew Taylor added that the “government should not wait for COVID infections to rocket and for NHS pressures to be sky high before the panic alarm is sounded”. But the government appears to be doing just that.

Further pressure

Coronavirus: lessons learned to date is a review from the Health and Social Care, and Science and Technology Committees, published on 12 October. It reported on the government’s handling of the pandemic. According to one commentary, the review accuses the authorities of British exceptionalism, a slow response, and “groupthink”. The review says that the government’s policy “led to a higher initial death toll than would have resulted from a more emphatic early policy”. The test, trace and isolate system also came under criticism from the report, stating it was “slow, uncertain and often chaotic”.

Meanwhile, family members of two coronavirus victims who died in care homes are to commence legal action against the government. They will argue that failure to protect their fathers was unlawful. The families’ lawyer, Paul Conrathe, said: “This case will give thousands of families a sense that justice has been done if we win”.

Those families, too, are undoubtedly furious with the government’s pandemic policy. As no doubt are the parents of the thousands of schoolchildren who unnecessarily suffered from the virus, thanks to government incompetence.

Featured image via Pixabay / Pixabay

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Could this scientist please tell readers how many people under-18 without other health problems have died from covid in the UK in the last 18 months? Also, could she tell readers where covid ranks in the causes of death among the under-18s?
      Without such perspective, articles such as this are simply PR from lobbyists not the independent journalism that The Canary promotes.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.