Government accused of recklessness for letting coronavirus run rampant in schools

Two children walking with arms around each other
Support us and go ad-free

Children across the UK have returned to school. But following changes in government policy, mitigation measures to prevent coronavirus (Covid-19) transmission in educational settings, such as ‘bubbles’, have been relaxed. And the only provision to improve ventilation is installation of CO2 monitors. That’s despite the possibility that children can die from the virus, or, as is far more likely, experience debilitating Long Covid.

Some clinicians have been blunt in their criticism of the current guidelines. They’ve accused the government of being “reckless” for allowing the “mass infection” of children.

Early warnings

Back in March 2021, investigative journalist Nafeez Ahmed referred to research published in the Lancet that “confirms that insufficient safety measures in schools have played a central role in “accelerating the pandemic””.

Ahmed said the research showed:

long-term COVID-19 symptoms or ‘Long COVID’ is now an increasing concern, with 13% of children aged two to 10 years and 15% of those aged 12 to 16 years experiencing at least one persistent COVID-19 symptom five weeks after testing positive.

The Lancet article warned:

Without additional mitigations [in schools], increases in transmission are likely, this time with more infectious and possibly more virulent variants, resulting in further lockdowns, school closures, and absenteeism.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Also in March, a survey by Unison further showed that 71% of “teaching, learning and special needs assistants, administrators, lunchtime supervisors and facility staff ​in England believe face coverings in secondary schools are an important safety measure​”.

Oxford University primary care professor Trish Greenhalgh also made it clear why mask wearing should continue in schools:

The laws of science governing the spread of droplets and airborne particles do not change with the age of the individual who emits those particles. Therefore, if we remove the masking policy in schools before community transmission of the virus has been contained, the virus will spread through schools.

“Cloud of fear”

However, many schools are no longer advocating mask usage as routine. Nor do they have effective ventilation systems in place. And according to education secretary Gavin Williamson, testing in schools may stop if it isn’t ‘needed’.

One primary school teacher explained:

there’s a cloud of fear hanging above all of our heads. Allowing the children in our care to become infected then infect each other with possible Long COVID is unforgivable

Dr Kit Yates of the University of Bath noted:

Children are returning to school against a background of community infection levels 26 times higher than at the same time last year, and with the much more transmissible Delta variant accounting for almost all infections

Greenhalgh commented:

The incidence of COVID-19 is much higher now than it is a year ago, and most cases are the highly contagious and more serious Delta variant. Since children aren’t vaccinated, they themselves are therefore at far greater risk than they were a year ago.

Pulling no punches

A number of scientists have now written to Williamson. Their letter requests that vaccines be offered to 12 to 15-year-olds.

The letter pulls no punches, pointing out:

In just the past two months there have been over 2300 hospitalisations of under 18s in England. There are an estimated 34 000 children living with long covid in the UK already, with 22 000 reporting significant impacts on their day to day activities, 7000 of whom have had symptoms for more than a year (Office for National Statistics)…

SARS-CoV-2 [Coronavirus] is a neurotrophic and pro-inflammatory virus with neuroinvasive potential that can infect the brain, with structural brain changes having been observed in adults, including those with mild infection. Allowing mass infection of children is therefore reckless. …

Children are now returning to school against a background of community infection levels 26 times higher than at the same time last year, and with the much more transmissible Delta variant accounting for almost all infections.

It adds:

There has been no plan for robust mitigation measures in schools to reduce the risk for children from infection and the consequences thereof, including Long COVID, hospitalisations, staff safety and educational disruption.

The letter makes nine recommendations as to how schools can tackle the pandemic. In addition, a more detailed plan for schools has now been re-published by Independent Sage.

Professor Christina Pagel is one of the signatories to the letter. She tweeted that there may be an argument for not vaccinating children, but only if mitigations were in place.

Following the science?

All in all, there appears to be profound disagreement between the government and many scientists on how schools should control the spread of the virus.

So the question remains, is the government still following, as claimed, the science? And if not, why not?

Featured image via Pxhere

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us