Journalists expose the deadly risks Julian Assange faces in US prisons

Julian Assange
Support us and go ad-free

On 27 and 28 October, the UK High Court was scheduled to hear further submissions regarding the US’s attempt to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. The US department of justice charged Assange with 18 offences, 17 of which come under the Espionage Act. In January 2021, judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled that the charges were valid. However, she also ruled that Assange shouldn’t be extradited for health reasons and because there was a risk he could end his life.

The prosecution appealed against the latter ruling and Assange’s defence subsequently offered a rebuttal to their objections. Meanwhile, journalists have exposed the prosecution’s bogus claims about the US prisons that await Assange if he’s extradited.

Journalists Kevin Gosztola and Mohamed Elmaazi summarised the prosecution’s five objections as follows:

the district judge improperly applied the United Kingdom’s extradition law; the district judge should have sought assurances from the U.S. government after she decided to deny the request; the district judge ought to have disqualified a key psychiatric expert; the district judge erred when considering evidence of suicide risk; and the U.K. government was issued a package of assurances that address the problems the district judge detailed in her decision.

Detention facilities

The prosecution listed a number of ‘assurances’ regarding the kind of prison regime Assange would face if extradited.

One such assurance was that Assange would not be subjected to Special Administrative Measures (SAMs). The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and a human rights centre at Yale Law School published a report on SAMs in 2017. CCR explains that:

SAMs are the darkest corner of the U.S. federal prison system, combining the brutality and isolation of maximum-security units with additional restrictions that deny individuals almost any connection to the human world. Those restrictions include gag orders on prisoners, their family members, and their attorneys, effectively shielding this extreme use of government power from public view.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Another assurance was that Assange wouldn’t be detained in the super-max prison ADX Florence. In September 2020, Gosztola commented:

if Assange was convicted and wound up in what is known as the H Block at ADX Florence, he would be housed in what has been described as the “only known black site on American soil,” or as Alan Prendergast put it for Westword, “A black hole, a void where men are slowly buried alive in layers of isolation until they vanish entirely.”

Even harsher

Instead, prosecution lawyer James Lewis claimed Assange would likely be detained in a Communications Management Unit (CMU). The prosecution maintains that this is a less harsh form of detention. And he added that Assange could even serve out his sentence, if found guilty, in an Australian prison.

Edward Fitzgerald QC for the defence accused the prosecution of trying to “minimise the severity of Mr Assange’s mental disorder and suicide risk”. As for the Australian option, it’s reported that has not been agreed, and if it was it could take a ‘decade’ to organise.

Gosztola and Elmaazi explain that if Assange was detained in a CMU:

he would likely be limited to two scheduled 15-minute phone calls per week. Those calls could be restricted to immediate family, and the prison could deny him a call if an FBI agent was not available to monitor his conversation.

The visitation policy for a prisoner in a CMU is harsher than the policy for SAMs. Contact visits are not allowed, meaning Moris and his children, Gabriel and Max, would not be able to hug or kiss him.

Speedy trial?

Gosztola and Elmaazi also addressed the issue of a “speedy trial” raised by the prosecution:

Lewis put forward a rosy but unrealistic scenario, where Assange’s legal team could apply for a “speedy trial,” challenge the prosecution on First Amendment grounds, and then Assange would prevail and go free.

They add:

The only way Assange would have his “speedy trial” rights respected is if he pleaded guilty to the charges or accepted some kind of a plea deal that would include prison time, but avoid a trial. That presumes the prosecutors would bargain with him.

All down to trust

In a video, Gosztola commented that the defence asked how the US can be trusted to abide by their assurances, given that the CIA, with encouragement from Mike Pompeo, wanted Assange killed. The Canary previously reported on death threats by US political figures, as well as the recent revelations concerning a CIA plot to kill or kidnap Assange.

Gosztola and Elmaazi comment on how the US government:

“retains the power” to designate Assange for either SAMs or ADX Florence if he commits “any future act” that meets the “test for such designation”; for example, if officials deem they must prevent a “breach of national security.”

Moreover, Assange could still end up under SAMs on the CIA’s recommendation. According to the defence:

One agency with power to recommend SAMs to the attorney general (on the basis of some unspecified ‘act’ they perceive Mr. Assange to have committed) is the CIA—the very same agency whose criminal acts Mr Assange has sought to expose, and who are under active investigation in Spain for plotting to kill him.

Fitzgerald further told the court that:

There are great grounds for fearing what will be done to [Assange] given the revelations of surveillance in the embassy and plots to kill him.

Condemnation by journalists’ bodies

Meanwhile, media organisations representing 600,000 journalists worldwide have condemned Assange’s prosecution and are calling for his immediate release:

Veteran BBC reporter John Simpson says that the attempt to extradite Assange is a threat to media freedom:

Indeed, Rebecca Vincent, director of international campaigns at Reporters Without Borders, commented:

if the US is successful in securing his [Assange’s] extradition, then the precedent it could set for any media organisation cannot be overstated.

More support

More support for Assange has come from a number of high profile figures. They include Labour MP John McDonnell, saying “if Assange is silenced, they can silence anyone”:

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn MP also reminded us that journalism is not a crime:

Could take weeks

Journalist Stefan Simanowitz warned that the High Court could take several weeks to reach a decision on what happens next. Meanwhile Assange’s fiance Stella Moris is demanding his release:

Whatever the court’s ruling, there could be further appeals by either the prosecution or the defence.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. What they have done to Julian Assange, and others, is the equivalent to the horses head being left on the pillow ( aka The Godfather movie ).

      Dare to shed a light upon the criminal, and downright dirty dealings, that are carried out on the instructions of the power mongers and the war hawks at your peril.

      That is the clear message.

      To us all!.

      Having no honour; no integrity; no sense of fairness or equality, and no compassion towards people is called ‘psychopathy’.

      Psychopaths know nothing of justice.

      Too many of them have risen to ‘unchecked power’, and as we know ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’.

      We are all witnesses to this happening in real time.

      It will take people with honour; integrity ; a sense of fairness and equality, and compassion for people, to end their rule.

      People like Julian Assange.

      Surely that courageous battle must be continuously fought by all of us.

      We are many, they are few.

    2. “Journalists” Internationaly sealed Julian Assange’s fate when they launched an onslaught of Propaganda that left The PEOPLE with a House of Commons filled with Thatcher’s Flavour of Neoliberalism on both sides of the aisle and No One to stand up and speak up for The PEOPLE!
      Not only did they seal Julian’s Fate but all of their own and all of ours! Freedom of Speech will be a luxury of history!
      Look at how power of position is already being abused in attempts to remove anonymity, even if anonymity is not a means to commit crime. If you do you will be found, unless you’re a seasoned pro hacker that can truly hide in the deepest darkest net, but even then there will be competition.
      This anonymity that Blue Keef and his Starmerstruppen are so obsessed about is to bring identity bellow the criminal spheres!
      This Anonymity Blue Keef and Thatcher’s Neo-New-Labour Party PARASITE TORIES are obsessed with will make us all THEIR Julian Assanges! So they can persecute us for a rude word or a rude comment, when Blue Keef knows Full Well breaking the law, will lead to your identity to be found! Just imagine if they couldn’t do that and a terror plot was planned, do people really believe that there will be no way to find the perpetrators!?
      Criminals should have their identity traceable, but those of us who are not afraid to say it how it is and with Truth ‘Bombs’ are not committing Crimes, but we sure do piss on a whole bunch of Criminal Elites/Establishment’s Serfs’ Batteries!
      Now, I wonder what on earth do those people want our identities for if we committed No Crimes!?
      2015 to 2020 and ongoing!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.