Heathrow workers ‘reject’ pay offer and are done being ‘given crumbs while shareholders pocket billions’

Support us and go ad-free

Indications from a ballot of thousands of workers at Heathrow Airport on whether to accept a pay offer point to an “overwhelming rejection”, union leaders have said.

Around 4,000 members of Unite, including security guards, firefighters and engineers, have been voting on a revised pay deal, with the result expected later on Friday.

Planned strikes were suspended while the workers voted on the offer, but industrial action on dates throughout August remain, with Unite saying walkouts next Monday and Tuesday look likely to go ahead.

The union warned Heathrow against opting to pay millions of pounds in compensation to airlines for cancelled flights rather than settling the pay dispute.

Unite officer Wayne King said: “All the indications are pointing to an overwhelming rejection by our members of the revised offer which, in reality, offers little more than the £3.75 extra a day that the original offer did for many workers.

“If members do reject the pay offer and Heathrow bosses dig their heels in, then there is a risk the airport is seen to prefer paying millions in compensation to airlines and needlessly causing misery for the travelling public, instead of sorting the dispute by going the extra mile and giving its workforce a decent pay rise.

“Our low-paid members will sacrifice a day’s pay if they go on strike and are only too aware of the disruption it will cause.

“However, they are at a point where they have had enough with being given crumbs while shareholders pocket billions in dividends and the chief executive enjoys a pay rise of over 100%.”

Talks are expected to be held immediately after the ballot result is announced.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Anyone still believing in the existence of ‘society’ should find it easy to grasp that consistently highly profitable businesses ought be obliged to set aside (into an independent trust) a sizeable chunk of income that otherwise would pass wholly to shareholders and to management bonuses, this for the purpose of staff welfare.

      The fund could be used in various ways. One such might be enhancing the staff pension fund so that future pay-outs can be larger. Another is provision of occasional bonus payments weighted towards the least well paid. A component could be held back to ensure pay deals don’t entail squeezing blood from a stone.

      Unfortunately, schools of management don’t appear to teach anything beyond profit maximisation. Management sensitive to the aspirations of its human chattels might find it literally pays dividends or, at least, promotes stability allowing a business to plan a head with confidence.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.