Potential jurors in the trial of Hillsborough match commander David Duckenfield have been asked their footballing allegiances.
The 75-year-old former police chief superintendent appeared in court as his retrial began in Preston Crown Court on Monday morning.
When the hearing started shortly after 11am, 100 potential jurors were brought into the courtroom, sitting in the jury box, public gallery and dock.
Judge Sir Peter Openshaw said: “In this case the defendant, David Duckenfield, is charged with manslaughter arising out of the Hillsborough stadium disaster at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, played at Sheffield, on April 15 1989.
“I must find jurors who can properly and fairly try such a case.”
The jury panel was given questionnaires made up of 19 questions to assess whether they were suitable to serve.
They were asked whether they, or any close relatives or friends, were supporters of Liverpool, Everton, Sheffield Wednesday or Nottingham Forest.
Duckenfield, wearing a grey suit, striped shirt and purple tie, sat in the well of the court during the hearing.
His wife Ann sat in court along with about 10 relatives of the 96 victims and 10 members of the press.
Other family members were able to watch proceedings via videolink at the Cunard building in Liverpool.
Potential jurors were asked whether they or family members had ever been employed by the police or by criminal agencies including the Crown Prosecution Service and the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
The questionnaire asked if they, or close relatives or friends, were at the stadium on the day of the disaster or had been involved in any Hillsborough campaign groups.
It also asked whether they had health problems or had any pre-booked holidays while the trial was due to sit.
The court was adjourned for the questionnaires to be completed.
Ninety-six men, women and children died as a result of the crush in pens at the Leppings Lane end of the Sheffield Wednesday ground at the match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest on April 15 1989.
Under the law at the time, there can be no prosecution for the death of the 96th victim, Tony Bland, as he died more than a year and a day after his injuries were caused.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?