Human rights organisations take MI5 to court for killing, torture and kidnapping

MI5 headquarters in London
Support us and go ad-free

On Tuesday 5 November, a four-day tribunal began as human rights organisations took MI5 to court. The case seeks accountability over a policy that allegedly allows agents to commit serious crimes, including kidnapping, torture, and murder. The policy also protects MI5 agents from prosecution for criminal conduct.

Barrister Ben Jaffey QC said:

the agents in question are not officers of the Security Service, but they are recruited and given directions by MI5.

Secret criminal activity

The organisations bringing this case to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal are Reprieve, Privacy International, the Pat Finucane Centre, and the Committee on the Administration of Justice.

They’re arguing that the policy in question has been “in place since at least the 1990s”. Moreover, they’re questioning secrecy around the policy, which they believe allows the government to evade criminal law without scrutiny.

Representing the organisations in court, Jaffey said:

the Security Service (MI5) are permitted under the policy to ‘authorise’ criminal conduct for a variety of purposes including any national security purpose. …

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
“Breaches of fundamental rights”

Jaffey pointed to “grave breaches of fundamental rights” in the name of the policy. He cited the 1989 murder of Irish solicitor Pat Finucane, in which state collusion played a role, as an example. He also mentioned Freddie Scappaticci, “who is alleged to have been a senior member of the IRA and a security service agent working under the codename ‘Stakeknife'”.

Jaffey said the government refused to confirm that these serious offences “could never be lawfully sanctioned under their policy”.

Meanwhile, James Eadie, QC for MI5, said:

It would be impossible [for MI5 to fulfil its functions] effectively without covert human intelligence sources.

Eadie also said:

They are indispensable to the work of the security service, and thus to its ability to protect the public from threats, notably from terrorist attackers

MI5 appeared before the tribunal over a year ago facing similar charges, but human rights organisations continue to seek justice.

Featured image via Flickr/ City.and.Color

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us